Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Anyone ever seen Richard Fleischer's 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA???

Anyone ever seen Richard Fleischer's 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA???

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
19 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    ringfire211 — 9 years ago(November 08, 2016 12:09 PM)

    Wait, is that the one where John Wayne plays Genghis Khan? If so then I can forgive Mason and anyone else involved in that debacle. Something like that is bound to be doomed from the get-go. When someone casts the Duke as a Mongol or a Roman centurion (as in THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD) then clearly someone has no clue what they're doing and have no business being in the movie business.
    Connery, Moore, and Brosnan! Accept NO substitutes!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      j_w_pepper — 9 years ago(November 08, 2016 12:18 PM)

      No, ring, that was THE CONQUEROR, twelve years or so earlier, directed by Dick Powelland apparently, the greatest mistake they made was not (as might be expected) to cast the Duke as Genghis Khan, but to film it near a Nevada nuclear test site, probably resulting in 40 per cent of the cast and crew developing some form of cancer. A mediocre Mason performance pales in comparison.
      Ceterum censeo OCTOPUSSY esse delendam.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(November 09, 2016 02:43 AM)

        Verily I say unto thee..of course it wasn't the John Wayne one which was made in 1956 and not 1965. I'm astonished at the lack of basic film knowledge exhibited by many on this board.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          ringfire211 — 9 years ago(November 09, 2016 02:01 PM)

          https://youtu.be/F0L-e_u52TU#t=1m20s
          Oh my!!! Oh my!!! Had I not seen this I may not have believed it.
          Love it!!! It's so enjoyable that it almost proves my point that Mason never gave a bad performance. This may be even more memorable than his "good" performances. I can't help but see Peter Sellers here doing his Sidney Wang in MURDER BY DEATH.
          One thing is for sure - we'll never see "performances" like these again due to political correctness.
          Connery, Moore, and Brosnan! Accept NO substitutes!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            j_w_pepper — 9 years ago(November 09, 2016 02:13 PM)

            Oh, there, voice come from cow on wall
            Ceterum censeo OCTOPUSSY esse delendam.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              ringfire211 — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 08:25 AM)

              Is that Sellers in MURDER BY DEATH?
              Connery, Moore, and Brosnan! Accept NO substitutes!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                j_w_pepper — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 10:40 AM)

                BINGO!
                Ceterum censeo OCTOPUSSY esse delendam.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  SuperDevilDoctor — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 02:19 AM)

                  The film
                  really
                  needs a Blu-ray release.
                  It got the deluxe DVD treatment from Disney some years ago, but 20KLUTS is a title I'd very much like to upgrade to hi-def.
                  It still holds up, even 60+ years on.
                  Send her to the snakes!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    ringfire211 — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 02:09 PM)

                    I agree. The film has held up very well. I expected it to look much more hoakey. Apparently the effects were groundbreaking for its time and the film won some Oscars in the SFX and technical departments.
                    Connery, Moore, and Brosnan! Accept NO substitutes!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 03:11 AM)

                      Verily I say unto theeyes of course.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        TheSharkFromJaws — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 04:59 AM)

                        I've only read the book. But it's a book ripe for a majestic adaptation.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          Vortimer — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 09:02 AM)

                          When I read the book a few years ago, I was surprised by how closely the Disney adaptation had followed the text. I kind of expected the mouse to have changed it more.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups