Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Was this the big fundamental problem w/ the Timothy Dalton era?

Was this the big fundamental problem w/ the Timothy Dalton era?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
17 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    TheSharkFromJaws — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 12:54 PM)

    No.
    The Living Daylights was a very popular movie and also a successful one. No, it wasn't Goldfinger popular, but neither were the prior few Moore flicks.
    Licence to Kill was a relative disappointment financially because of bad marketing decisions and very stiff competition. However, it was still a reasonable critical success.
    Dalton was all set for a third film and probably one or two additional films, but it was derailed by the studio's financial struggles.
    Modern perspective of the Dalton films not being accepted is the result of rewriting history due the commonly spread idea that Dalton was booted after LTK "bombing", which is obviously untrue but since it's such a firm and longstanding belief with general audiences, it's difficult to tell people otherwise.
    It's the same as trying to tell people that Batman Forever was actually a well liked and hugely successful film back in 95 and not the disaster people see it as today because of years of people associating it with Batman and Robin.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      RynoII — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 01:17 PM)

      LTK was much better at showing a more serious Bond than TLD was. TLD had too much camp and Roger Moore tone that clashed with Dalton's portrayal, which is why LTK is the much better Dalton movie for me.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        rich_bruce — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 04:37 PM)

        Yeah, where failure myths failed over time for ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE and more recently QUANTUM OF SOLACE, LICENCE TO KILL is an easy target.
        One true problem with the Dalton era: he never got the big third mission like GOLDFINGER or THE SPY WHO LOVED ME.
        What no man
        C
        an give ya. And none
        C
        an take away.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          RynoII — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 05:18 PM)

          He wouldn't have likely topped LTK anyway, but it's possible.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            TheSharkFromJaws — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 05:54 PM)

            Indeed. Had Timmy had that third film, it no doubt would have been his definitive "big" Bond flick and the general audiences would be broadly approving of him

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              pking-2 — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 11:14 PM)

              You're not getting much support here, but I in a broad sense agree with you.
              Dalton's portrayal was not really supposed to be a crowd pleaser, at least not via comedy or satire. But a Fleming-reader pleaser through a more faithful, if grim, take on things.
              Perhaps its your semantic construct that this is a "big fundamental problem" when it isn't, to many, a problem, in terms of entertainment.
              But it
              was
              somewhat of a problemat the box office. Love it or hate it, Dalton's era was unimpressive and disappointing at the box office compared to
              all
              the other Bond eras, overall, maybe even more of a concern than even Laz/OHMSS from a franchise profit/relevancy/survival/business point of view. Which has nothing to do with what anyone enjoys, really.
              Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm rea
              d
              er.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                Ronsin1976 — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 09:16 AM)

                Well with Dalton you have a more serious Bond, which to some was a boring one. I mean look at Moore's Bond, he's the kind of guy you could drink a half pint with down at the pub and tell jokes all day long. I could not imagine doing that with Dalton's Bond. Moore was more self-deprecating, a wee bit for my liking. People like a lad who is willing to have a joke at his expense.
                But it was somewhat of a problemat the box office. Love it or hate it, Dalton's era was unimpressive and disappointing at the box office compared to all the other Bond eras,
                Dalton's Bond wasn't a complete letdown outside of the U.S. His two movies did reasonably well in Europe. I remembered the summer of 1989 being a strong season for movies. A reason why they release the films now towards the latter part of the year (e.g. November).
                Voting Tory will cause your wife to have bigger breasts and increase your chances of owning a BMW M3

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  pking-2 — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 10:23 AM)

                  All Bond movies and eras have been profitable, so when Dalton (or AVTAK or TMWTGG or OHMSS etc) is under scrutiny we are discussing the difference between fantastic profit vs. disappointing profit, but always profit nonetheless. And yes, LTK's biggest eyebrow raiser was its weak US box office.
                  Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm rea
                  d
                  er.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    louiseculmer — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 10:29 AM)

                    I liked the living daylights. there was quite a bit of joking in that. didn't like Licensed to Kill - too violent and not enough humour.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 05:59 AM)

                      Verily I say unto thee..perhaps you would have enjoyed LICENCE TO KILL more if you were capable of correctly naming the title.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        louiseculmer — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 07:23 AM)

                        no, i wouldn't. Like i said, it was too violent and didn't have enough humour for my taste. You seem to have great difficulty understanding simple statements. perhaps English is not your first language?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 04:41 AM)

                          Verily I say unto theeyour statements are certainly simple there is no doubt and kudos to LICENCE TO KILL for the violence contained within it.I watch films and US TV shows ten times more violent practically every day of the week and revel in them.Have you ever seen THE WALKING DEAD for example? LTK is like a Disney film in comparison.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            galluslass — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 12:29 AM)

                            Only problem I had with Dalton's era was that he only did two. Loved the new direction after years of Moore.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups