This message has been deleted.
-
OnceUponATimeInTheWest — 11 years ago(March 04, 2015 05:59 AM)
I have seen this film many times and I think Teresa Wright is absolutely gorgeous. I was looking for a thread like this because I definitely felt there sexual tension between them. In real life they were about 13 years apart and actually played husband and wife in the film The Steel Trap 1952. I have read some of the posts ascribing this train of thought as dirty etc.but that is ridiculous. Now if I had a niece that looked likejust kidding (not really)
-
OnceUponATimeInTheWest — 11 years ago(March 04, 2015 11:32 AM)
I have seen this film many times and I think Teresa Wright is absolutely gorgeous. I was looking for a thread like this because I definitely felt there sexual tension between them. In real life they were about 13 years apart and actually played husband and wife in the film The Steel Trap 1952. I have read some of the posts ascribing this train of thought as dirty etc.but that is ridiculous. Now if I had a niece that looked likejust kidding (not really)
-
DracTarashV — 10 years ago(August 05, 2015 09:12 PM)
Even if the - arguable - incestuous subtext in the film was nonexistent, one cannot deny their relationship was something special.
Young C was clearly enamored with her uncle in the beginning.
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry! -
Maddyclassicfilms — 10 years ago(August 09, 2015 08:32 AM)
I think you're right. I always had the same reaction as you to the way in which she runs off from the bar and he chases her. Maybe this was intentional on Hitchcock's part and we are meant to think this or perhaps we are all reading too much into it because of the strong chemistry between Cotten and Wright.
The fact that so many people on this thread think the same thing though proves there has to be something to this idea.
Go to bed Frank or this is going to get ugly
. -
amyghost — 10 years ago(August 09, 2015 12:02 PM)
I've always felt that there's a strong suggestion that Uncle Charlie means to rob Young Charlie of her innocencewhich he does symbolically in the bar sequence. It seems plain enough that Hitchcock was definitely hinting Charles meant to rob her of her innocence in another, and less symbolic way, as wellbut this had to be confined to hints, as something that certainly couldn't have been said blatantly in the language of 1940's Hollywood film.
-
cesetevi — 10 years ago(January 02, 2016 04:11 AM)
yes there is and i think it is intentional.Because when young one goes to post office she explains mental telepathy which confronts telegram.That dialogue is something I find very clever.Before the physical tension, I mean newspaper grabbing scene, there are many emotional reasonings that young one talks about.From humming waltz to feeling old one.
-
amyghost — 10 years ago(January 02, 2016 05:43 AM)
That's a good point. It's young Charlie herself who points out more than once that she's moving towards maturity, and is no longer the child her family somewhat regards her as, with the exception of Charles.