Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. $1.80 an hour? Well boo-f'n-hoo.

$1.80 an hour? Well boo-f'n-hoo.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
15 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    JLearn — 15 years ago(March 06, 2011 05:30 AM)

    So, Sshelly, at least one of us is confused (or maybe just not getting your joke?) it was Curtis' character, Joker Jackson, that was complaining about the $1.80/hr wage.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        JLearn — 15 years ago(March 09, 2011 09:12 AM)

        Keep in mind that these were 1959 wages we're talking about here. The federal minimum wage then was $1/hr so, as a previous poster noted, he was doing pretty well to make $1.80. I can see that movie viewers in the '50s would not be very sympathetic to his complaint.
        There's an interesting graph at this web site (http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html) that shows that, adjusting for inflation, $1/hr was equivalent to more than $7/hr, so $1.80 was like more than $12.60/hr in terms of modern day earning power. That'd be like more than $500/wk for a 40 hr week. He was not going to get rich at that rate, but he wasn't just scraping by either.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            JLearn — 15 years ago(March 10, 2011 06:28 AM)

            I absolutely agree again to refer to that graph on that web site I mentioned, the minimum wage, in terms of earning power peaked in 1969. It has generally been declining ever since. But most people who get paid minimum wage have absolutely no power to bargain for anything better.
            Them that's got shall get

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              IMDb User

              This message has been deleted.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                vinidici — 14 years ago(January 16, 2012 07:30 PM)

                hence, the rush by illegal immigrants to fill in those low-paying jobs that nobody else wants (but that still pay better than the kind of work available back in their native country)except we keep making it hard for those folks to stay around to keep working those jobs! Catch 22 if there ever was one!
                BTW, I thought this movie was set during the Great Depression. Buck-eighty an hour would have been pretty-damn-good money in those days!
                Whatever you do, DO NOT read this sigACKKK!!!
                TOO LATE!!!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  jejozi — 13 years ago(June 19, 2012 04:46 PM)

                  That's less than $20,000 in today's dollar. Yeah, you can live high on the hog for that much.
                  This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    jgroub — 13 years ago(June 19, 2012 07:16 PM)

                    Nope; $72 per week for 52 weeks is $3744 per year. Having watched a good deal of Mad Men, 1959 wages are equivalent to about 10 times what they are today, so that's $37 grand per year. That might not be high off the hog, but it's nothing to complain about.
                    I want the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      jejozi — 13 years ago(June 20, 2012 03:51 AM)

                      Go to an inflation calculator site and punch in those numbers. Fyi, Mad men is a tv show.
                      This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        jejozi — 13 years ago(June 20, 2012 03:53 AM)

                        Also, the movie came out in '58 and he was talking about jobs from his past, so it was more like '55.
                        This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          elisedfr — 12 years ago(June 18, 2013 11:07 AM)

                          If I remember correctly, Poitier's character (who was a farmer before being put in jail) actually says something like "nice" or "not bad at all". But Tony wanted to make it really big. Besides, working in a factory is never fun, regardless of the income.
                          " You ain't running this place, Bert, WILLIAMS is!" Sgt Harris

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups