Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. The remake is much much better but it's not on DVD!

The remake is much much better but it's not on DVD!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
8 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Paranoiac


    taylorje — 17 years ago(May 16, 2008 04:53 AM)

    It was released in the 1980's and is titled "Brat Farrar". It's much, much better than this movie. Both are based on the novel by Josephine Tey. "Paranoiac" has so many things different from the book.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Harold_Robbins — 17 years ago(October 25, 2008 09:07 AM)

      PARANOIAC has enough similarity to BRAT FARRAR that when I first watched the film 3 years or so ago I immediately thought "damned if this isn't similar to BRAT FARRAR by Josephine Tey" - I'd read several of Tey's novels, but didn't see her name in the credits, though a quick check here at IMDB showed the novel as an "uncredited" source - Did Jimmy Sangster actually try to pass this off as an original screenplay, hoping that by then Tey's novel was obscure enough that no one would notice? Or did they attempt to buy screen rights but couldn't afford them? Who knows? Ver-ry inter-resting!
      It's a well-done thriller but could have used a lit-tle more character development.
      "If I'd been a ranch they'd have named me the 'Bar-None'."

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          35541m — 14 years ago(June 02, 2011 03:34 AM)

          If Josephine Tey did request her name be removed from the credits of Paranoiac she must have done this via a medium.
          She died in 1952.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              SAlexLindsay — 16 years ago(April 14, 2009 12:57 PM)

              I wouldn't judge a film simply by how faithful it was to its source material. A film can have its own identity, and I honestly thought the Hammer production was a more impressive piece of film-making than the 80s adaption you mentioned.
              Just down to taste I guess.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Wot_larks — 15 years ago(December 15, 2010 06:22 PM)

                great dramatization of the novel.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  35541m — 15 years ago(January 21, 2011 02:51 AM)

                  Hammer purchased the rights to Brat Farrar in 1958 and the film kept appearing on its production schedules for a while. Paul Dehn (a film critic for a national newspaper) was hired to write the script. He wrote at least a treatment back then which, based on a Hammer press release, seemed to be much more faithful to the original novel and included the show jumping background.
                  The project was then shelved for a few years. It then resurfaced in 1962 when Hammer decided that psychological thrillers were back in. Jimmy Sangster wrote a new script from scratch which, as many have noted, differs a lot from the novel. One would guess that most of the differences were due to budget - hence the whole show jumping stuff was scratched as too expensive and the action confined to a single location using only 4-5 main characters.
                  I had wondered why Tey's novel wasn't credited at all.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups