The worst film ever?
-
hjr2000 — 20 years ago(June 13, 2005 05:48 AM)
It was showing on ordinary TV. Therefore I didnt have to go and request my money back for such poor product. However I have walked out before, Naked Gun 2.5 was the last occasion. Others I have stuck out because I have paid 6.50 to see it and want my money's worth. 'About Schmidt' was probably the last film i recall to be just about worthy of that.
As for the camcorder idea, sometime I wouldn't mind having a go at attempting to upstage 'The Party'. Perhaps a 1.5 hour documentary on the physics of drying paint?
-
nnenad — 20 years ago(June 14, 2005 02:57 AM)
hjr2000 : "It was showing on ordinary TV. Therefore I didnt have to go and request my money back for such poor product. However I have walked out before, Naked Gun 2.5 was the last occasion. Others I have stuck out because I have paid 6.50 to see it and want my money's worth. 'About Schmidt' was probably the last film i recall to be just about worthy of that. "
That's the difference between you and me - I watch movies not to enterntain me but to learn something from them. I believe there are many things that I don't know and I'm trying to use every opportunity I have to learn something new. And believe me, The Party is a movie you can learn from, especially as a person (this is not about you, but everyone). Try to ditch the I-don't-have-the-time-to-watch-it-because-it's-dull attitude, and you will see that many wonderful things may happen to you. It's not about 1$ for 1kg of enterntainment - it doesn't work that way, and you'll never find any movie or art form in general to give you that.
If you are a skilled filmmaker - then I guess your best solution is to make movies yourself. It will give you much more in return then watching other peoples stuff.
'Perhaps a 1.5 hour documentary on the physics of drying paint?'
Actually, do you know what exact process makes paint dry? I don't know and I know you don't. So - we would benefit from watching such a documentary. We would learn. -
hjr2000 — 20 years ago(June 14, 2005 03:26 AM)
Actually i think that most people watch films for entertainment purposes. Therefore films need to be entertaining and hold your attention. I suppose you could watch the Party as a means of seeing how it shouldnt be done.
-
nnenad — 20 years ago(June 21, 2005 04:33 AM)
hjr2000: "I suppose you could watch the Party as a means of seeing how it shouldnt be done."
You have a point - and it is my point also - if you walked out, you didn't see how it shouldn't be done. So how can you know which movie is good/interesting/entertaining if you do not watch the bad/dull/complicated ones (to the end)?
hjr2000: "Actually i think that most people watch films for entertainment purposes"
They do not. There are a lot of others who try to find artistic value in movies, which are an art form to begin with. Just as painting, music, writing, they are used to express authors thoughts, feelings and ideas about the world they live in. Also, movies are the most powerful way to express yourself artisticaly (picture, sound, dialogue, colors, shapes, cuts etc).
If you do not even try to find it - you are losing.
I feel that if I watch the movie and only have fun, that I lost valuable time which I could have spent elsewhere. There are far better ways to have fun than watch movies. -
hjr2000 — 20 years ago(June 21, 2005 05:45 AM)
Well, I suppose different people get different things out of films. However I would guess not many people go to the cinema to watch a new blockbuster because of the artistic value of the film, they go to be entertained.
As for watching the whole of the Party in the hope that it might actually turn into a good film, if it doesnt do anything for the first 30 minutes then i am certainly not about to waste time watching the rest of it! -
7rym — 20 years ago(August 31, 2005 07:14 PM)
You sound like a sad person
If you can't enjoy simple fun like Sellers offers, or the excellent slapstick in the Nake Gun movies, you simply should not go see them!
Don't waste your own time seeing movies you don't like, and don't waste our time telling us that you don't have the ability to see the hilarious comedy presented in theese movies because there is noe cue for you when to laugh!
Why do you bother see comedy if you obviously don't like it?
Why go see a Naked Gun movie if you knew you didn't find it funny when you saw the trailer?
Are you going to tell me that you are an open minded person who gives every movie a fair chance before you condemn them?
There are thousands of great movies out there, go watch the ones you like and stop spreading stories of your sad life to others! -
Greenteeth — 20 years ago(June 14, 2005 10:02 AM)
I agree with you, hjr. I saw this movie in the theater when it first came out and it drove me batty. Then it kept coming on TV and my friends insisted on watching it. It's like this big monkey I had riding on my back.
-
alexandernopolis — 20 years ago(June 20, 2005 10:25 PM)
It's a subtle humour. It's not gut-busting, it's funny for its awkwardness and believable scenarios. Like 'The Office'.
I grew up on this stuff, and it was hilarious back then, now it has a fond place in my mind as believable comedy.