Job numbers that might have changed from 4.3% unemployment to 4.4% after a revision? Oh the horror.
-
Yermom_Is_God — 7 months ago(August 09, 2025 02:32 AM)
Uncreative said...
Did you know that the original revision saying they overestimated around 800,000 jobs was had a secondary revision 6 months later to make the final miscount 500,000 instead of 800,000? Of course you didn't. But if there was a media conspiracy like your claim then they would have been working overtime trying to spin a story that there were 300,000 extra jobs compared to the story 6 months earlier.
It's not a conspiracy, the media is constantly playing cover for Democrats.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
-
/.ㅤ — 7 months ago(August 09, 2025 02:50 AM)
Yermom_Is_God said...
It's not a conspiracy, the media is constantly playing cover for Democrats.
It's not a conspiracy, the media is constantly playing cover for Democrats.
$787 million says otherwise.
My password is password. -
/.ㅤ — 7 months ago(August 09, 2025 03:01 AM)
/.ㅤ said...
It's not a conspiracy, the media is constantly playing cover for Democrats.
$787 million says otherwise.
That proves the government is trying to censor conservative views. Bootlicker partisan hack. Now excuse me while I go simp for some more billionaires like the independent thinker I am.
My password is password. -
Yermom_Is_God — 7 months ago(August 09, 2025 05:18 AM)
/.ㅤ said...
It's not a conspiracy, the media is constantly playing cover for Democrats.
$787 million says otherwise.
No it doesn't.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 
