This movie was not good

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

greenbudgie — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 03:13 AM)

I wasn't too keen on the characters generally. Reverend Runt and Captain Feeney should have featured more. They are the characters that took my eye.
The strength of the movie for me is the evocation of period setting. It is what I would imagine being transported back to the 18th century would be like. And the photography is terrific.

[fgadmin]

Hythlodaeus — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 04:30 AM)

Yes the period aspect was good as were some characters.

[fgadmin]

RP_Mac_27 — 9 years ago(June 10, 2016 02:33 PM)

Kubrick did some good stuff. This is not one of them.

[fgadmin]

Hythlodaeus — 9 years ago(June 10, 2016 07:03 PM)

agreed
What hump?

[fgadmin]

KobiyashiMauru — 9 years ago(July 03, 2016 07:08 PM)

You can see the incredible effort made by the cast and crew to get this period piece classic to the screen. I enjoyed the entire film. One of my Kubrick favorites.
Luke Skywalker, your Mom was hawt!
Darth Vader

[fgadmin]

sturmtiger00 — 9 years ago(August 14, 2016 08:47 PM)

Just watched it for the first time and I thought it was great.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

louiseculmer — 9 years ago(October 09, 2016 01:51 PM)

I thought it was very boring. A long dull story about an unpleasant character. He was horrible to his wife and his stepson. Glad she dumped him in the end.

[fgadmin]

Hythlodaeus — 9 years ago(October 11, 2016 09:48 AM)

Pretty much, yeah.
What hump?