Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Brooke Shields is barely in this!

Brooke Shields is barely in this!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
17 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 17, 2016 11:38 AM)

    It was her first film.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      roses888 — 10 years ago(January 17, 2016 03:28 PM)

      Well it's advertised that she has a big part in the movie, when she's only in it for fifteen minutes at most. She's a very minor part in it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        renatom1 — 10 years ago(January 17, 2016 04:39 PM)

        That's all part of the advertising. Everyone else is unknown, so you market the one audiences know. It's the same reason
        He Knows You're Alone
        drops Tom Hanks' name every chance it gets even though his part is tiny. By the way, did you watch this on TCM last night?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          roses888 — 10 years ago(January 18, 2016 05:20 AM)

          Yes, I just watched it on TCM.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            renatom1 — 10 years ago(January 19, 2016 04:34 PM)

            I saw it too, and it was my first time seeing it. It's been years since I've been wanting to watch it, and I finally got a chance. I thought it was good.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              IMDb User

              This message has been deleted.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:19 PM)

                same here. I finally watched it on TCM a couple weeks ago after wanting to watch it for about 15 years. and boy it definitely wasn't overrated. it lived up to it's hype and was even better than it's hype.
                man, for movies that are hyped up a lot and are given a great reputation, how often do these movies out perform and are better than this hype? I mean my expectations were met and more. it impressed me more than what my expectations were. it over performed my expectations. I would say that for films with this level of hype and reputation or more that there are less than 10% of these movies that outplay and are better than their high reputation and expectations.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:13 PM)

                  but the problem with this theory is that this was made before Brooke was known. it was made in 1976, so before pretty baby. so why would they advertise her being in it back in 1976 or 1977?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 17, 2016 09:22 PM)

                    All TCM did was advertise that she was in it. Nothing was said about a big part.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      littlenightmusic-15077 — 10 years ago(January 18, 2016 12:02 AM)

                      I saw it years ago so I DVRd it.
                      Still a very disturbing movie for many reasons.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:28 PM)

                        exactly. it is extremely effective in jarring and disturbing your emotions and making you feel so horrible trauma and despair and remorse when people are killed or hurt. I have almost never been so deeply depressed, affected, and disturbed and hurt emotionally by a person getting killed in movie as I was when Karen is killed by her sister
                        AND WHEN HER MOTHER FINDS OUT IN THE CHURCH!!! it was the most heart wrenching, gut punching, horrible moment of emotional distress and sadness and despair and emotional trauma and remorse that I have ever seen in a movie. my heart was in knots.
                        I have never experienced a scene of discomfort and emotional sadness where I actually am unnerved and extremely emotionally disturbed like it before. it was more painful and emotionally damaging and emotionally effective of a scene of emotional trauma, turmoil, physical distress, and depression and distress and remorse than any other scene in movie history.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:12 PM)

                          and that is exactly the reason why I said that is wrong how they advertised her as being one main stars in this film. that is false advertising. she is in it for no longer than 15 minutes. I hate this kind of film marketing. and it's surprising as back in the '70s they didnt' do this kind of false advertising that often for movies. she is on one of the covers for the video boxes or her name is on the cover for one of the video boxes, this is wrong.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            noveltylibrary — 10 years ago(January 21, 2016 06:02 PM)

                            it's too bad, she a better actress.. she should have played the surviving sister.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              Mr_Ectoplasma — 9 years ago(June 13, 2016 03:05 PM)

                              She was too young for the part. She is barely in the film, sure, but her part in the film was what gave it publicity when it was re-released.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:09 PM)

                                I know, exactly I was so disappointed and not satisfied with how much she is in this film. she should have been in it at least 15 minutes more than she was.
                                we barely know her character because they dont' tell you that much at all about her character and her character barely says anything so when she gets killed although you feel such great sympathy and depression and anguish and remorse over her dying because she is so innocent and pure and sweet, you would have felt so much more remorse, depression, anguish, sympathy, and despair if you had known her character more than you did.
                                also I was really disappointed and unsatisfied seeing Brooke barely, barley at all in this film because I wanted to see her so much more than I did because I love her and because I love her as an actress and because I loved her character and also I really, extremely didn't want her to die when she was killed because her character was so innocent, lovely, sweet, and kind, and beautiful as a person.
                                also I really, really wanted to see her more in this film because she is without a doubt the most beautiful little girl, 12 years old or younger that I have ever seen. OH MY GOSH!!! OH MY GOSH!!! I was so astounded and devastated by her unseen at her age and unequaled at her age beauty. I dont' care who at her age or younger who you compare her beauty, prettiness, or adorableness to she beats them all. Elizabeth taylor, diane lane, or anyone other girl all pale in comparison to her.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  americanadian25 — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 06:52 AM)

                                  That happens sometimes, when they hype up a big star in a film, but they only have what's basically a cameo. Though I guess Brooke Shields wasn't huge at the time.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups