Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Seriously, you have NO idea what you are talking about. Animatronics existed in the 60s. Stunt people have been around

Seriously, you have NO idea what you are talking about. Animatronics existed in the 60s. Stunt people have been around

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    Ripshin — 9 years ago(June 27, 2016 06:22 PM)

    You didn't specify, but fixated on movement. Yes, I said it was a cheap film.
    I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about. I worked on an early CGI film, and know the timeline.
    Your original comment is all over the map.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      shannonlee1956 — 9 years ago(June 27, 2016 09:32 PM)

      namaGemo is correct! The kitten was real all throughout the scene, I am an animal rescuer and find homes for cats and dogs and I am very aware of the way cats move. This does not mean the cat died do to the actions of the actress. Cats are very agile and I have seen them get themselves in similar positions and were just fine. Having said that the scene was disturbing to watch as an animal lover.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 04:53 AM)

        do you really think that the actress who played Alice would be ok with killing a kitten? and if she did don't you think she would have talked about it after the film came out either out of guilt or because every person who watched it wondering if she killed it had asked her about it?
        and also with all the takes they do for movies do you really think that they would have killed that many kittens? and just because it looked dead how can you know it's dead? I wasn't worried that it got killed I was just curious.
        anyway take away all this uprising and sadness and who cares? kittens if there are too many are drowned you know. and stray cats are killed or die. why are kittens more important than cows or pigs or any animals?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          gribfritz2 — 10 years ago(January 18, 2016 11:26 PM)

          roflmaoeveryone's acting like they show a cat getting its head cut off. A character is holding a cat by the neck and throws it to the ground which is OFF camera. She could have dropped it on a pile of fluffy pillows for all anyone knows. Hell, do it in a carpeted area and the thing would have landed on its feet and walked away. Nothing to see here. Moving on.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 19, 2016 10:22 AM)

            Truly

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              namaGemo — 10 years ago(January 20, 2016 11:31 AM)

              The way everyone made it sound is that it was killed like a scene from Cannibal Holocaust.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                aios-dum — 10 years ago(March 27, 2016 09:51 AM)

                It was most likely a kitten that was grabbed by the head, then twisted and held like that in the air. You don't know how many takes were done for this.
                You can see and hear the cat meowing, before and after it is tossed on the floor (after being dropped you can no longer see it), but it's obvious that it was treated violently, after all, and that it could have been harmed, being a baby most likely.
                It's disgusting, should I not care because they did not decapitate it? I truly believe people were and in part still are retards for harming and distressing animals in the making of movies. It's stupid and not worth it!
                No matter what bunch of pillows it may have landed on (though I could bet they didn't care for something like that), what you see on camera is enough to realize you're actually witnessing animal cruelty. The fact that they even had a child actor do that is worse, that's the eduction that girl got about animals, they're just useless fluffs to be tossed around. No excuse.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  cdjunkee-1 — 9 years ago(June 26, 2016 07:32 AM)

                  I don't think she actually strangled the Cat. She held it in the air to make it look like that and dropped it. Before that it looks like a stuffed animal before dropping it. I doubt she actually crushed a Kitten's windpipe for 30 takes.
                  Also in the scene Alice places the Jar filled with Cockroaches on Alfonso that same Kitten she had grabbed earlier is sitting on the Couch with him. They made a point of showing him.
                  Despite that the Kitten looks scared. If it was done today it would've been done differently. No rough handling of the Kitten. Can't do anything about it now. Best to focus on today to try to stop animal abuse and neglect.
                  ~Keep on Trucking!~

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 05:09 AM)

                    who cares? the only reason why people care is because it's a cat. if it was pig or cow people wouldn't care. but because cats and dogs are pets it somehow is worse. it doesn't matter at all. the cat healed up if it even was hurt at all and even it died who cares? cats and dogs are routinely killed in Asian countries.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 05:06 AM)

                      exactly and what is really dumb and makes no sense is this is horror film, a horror film. so why are you watching it if you have a problem with something like a cat being possibly hurt???? that goes against the logic of being a R rated horror movie fan. R rated horror movie fans like to watch violence and are tough viewers. so, it doesn't make any sense strangely having a hard time watching a kitten getting roughly handled or possibly hurt or killed.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups