Any Californians affected by this fire?
-
Uncreative — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:00 PM)
What outsize contributions? We've contributed twice as much in our history with a fraction of their population. Even now with them having a higher annual number they're still contributing a lot less per person.
-
Vlad. — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:05 PM)
China currently contributes the most to global warming, as it is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide globally, accounting for roughly 35% of total global emissions, primarily due to its reliance on coal-fired power plants to fuel its rapidly growing economy; this means that China's actions have a significant impact on climate change.
Oh.
https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ef196dfad720c128&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS1062US1062&hl=en-US&sxsrf=ADLYWIJ3_TsMIV1hijVIQ8JoDrPguLshjQ:1736366675733&q=chinese+contribution+global+warming&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifpaD39eaKAxV2EVkFHY7_O7MQkeECKAB6BAgKEAE&biw=430&bih=745&dpr=3
Stop. -
Vlad. — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:41 PM)
Uncreative said...
That doesn't contradict anything I told you. I already acknowledged that they're the biggest in terms of raw output per year now. Per capita they're still well below us. Learn to read, bro.
China is the main human contributor. Next is the ice age.
There’s nothing to be done on my end. Good game. I win. Moving one
Stop. -
/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:42 PM)
Vlad. said...
China is the main human contributor. Next is the ice age.
There’s nothing to be done on my end. Good game. I win. Moving one
China is the main human contributor. Next is the ice age.
There’s nothing to be done on my end. Good game. I win. Moving one
Moving one what?
My password is password. -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:45 PM)
Vlad. said...
China is the main human contributor. Next is the ice age.
There’s nothing to be done on my end. Good game. I win. Moving one
You already lost the ice age argument. Just like you lost the outsized contribution argument and the historical contribution argument. How many times do I need to teach you this lesson, old man? You're a sub 5/10 debater. -
Sophienoire — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:47 PM)
Uncreative said...
You already lost the ice age argument. Just like you lost the outsized contribution argument and the historical contribution argument. How many times do I need to teach you this lesson, old man? You're a sub 5/10 debater.
the sound of your racing heart -
Vlad. — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 08:54 PM)
Uncreative said...
You already lost the ice age argument. Just like you lost the outsized contribution argument and the historical contribution argument. How many times do I need to teach you this lesson, old man? You're a sub 5/10 debater.
China makes up over a quarter of the contribution per your own epa numbers. Give up. You’ve lost.
Stop. -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 09:08 PM)
Vlad. said...
China makes up over a quarter of the contribution per your own epa numbers. Give up. You’ve lost.
They have 4x the population with 2.5x the emissions. Compared to us, which is a very low standard to beat, that's comparatively clean. They could be doing better. We should be too. They're the ones putting more effort into it and expected to hit their absolute peak this year. -
Vlad. — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 09:00 PM)
Uncreative said...
You already lost the ice age argument. Just like you lost the outsized contribution argument and the historical contribution argument. How many times do I need to teach you this lesson, old man? You're a sub 5/10 debater.
US contributes to 10% in 2022.
Your 25% figure was based on contributions since 1970. So, your facts are outdated and your argument is dead.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/climate-change/
Stop. -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 09:10 PM)
Vlad. said...
US contributes to 10% in 2022.
Your 25% figure was based on contributions since 1970. So, your facts are outdated and your argument is dead.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/climate-change/
It was actually since 1750, but the date is irrelevant. Carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere for centuries. You asked what our contribution was. I gave it to you. I win again. -
Vlad. — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 10:24 PM)
Uncreative said...
It was actually since 1750, but the date is irrelevant. Carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere for centuries. You asked what our contribution was. I gave it to you. I win again.
Actually you don’t.
Maybe the US was the major contributor once upon a time per your stat but they’re not the chief driver behind climate change now.
You’ve failed. This is an Illuminati victory. One world forum.
Stop. -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(January 08, 2025 07:53 PM)
It's something that's extremely easy to look up for anyone who cares to put in the minimal amount of effort it takes.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/11/china-building-twice-as-much-wind-and-solar-power-as-rest-of-world-report
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 