Were the moon landings faked?
-
g-illo — 20 years ago(February 11, 2006 01:35 AM)
According to the Moon Cospiracy videos that I've seen, they state that all shuttle missions are well bellow the Van Allen radiation belt. They in fact that they mention a particilar shuttle mission where they went the farthest away from the earth in a shuttle, the astronauts experianced high radiation effects such as seeing flashes when one closes his eyes. NASA made an official statement that the levels of radiation in the Van Allen belt were much higher than they orrigionally asumed.
-
Blueghost — 21 years ago(July 27, 2004 02:01 AM)
One of the best books out there on the subject of the moon landing is titled "dark moon - apollo and the whistleblowers" by David S Percy and Mary D Bennett. Scientifically, the official story from the corporate media and NASA does not hold water.
"Scientifically" it does. If you could be more specific on what part of the science you think is misleading, then I'm sure the rest of us would love to hear about it, and challange it with opposing thoughts. That's what SCIENCE is all about.
The program was called, "Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" and the NASA director for the media Brian Welch had no response to leading researcher's questions except for: "We went to the moon and anyone who doesn't believe it is nuts." Sorry but that would have been the perfect time for NASA to state its case once and for all and the director's defensive mode reminded me of your statement.
The idea being that you want to believe that you've come across something few other people realize just to show how clever you are, and to get a laugh. Neat.
Like I said before, I don't know where I stand on the issue. I haven't researched it enough.
Apparently.
I know that the whole moon mission is very hoaxable.
No you don't. You're just being a jerk, and are insulting the plethora of test pilots who tested technology platforms by putting their lives on the line by flying rockets with wings. Then again, maybe their funerals were faked.
Odds are you have (or were the recipient of) poor grades in school, and want to show just how smart you are by pointing the finger at people who, quite frankly, know their field a lot better than you. Either that or your just some 12 year old punk, and I'm wasting my time.
Regardless, rather than rely on someone else trying to make a buck off your ignorance (because that's all this amounts to; and specifically the books and programs you've exposed your to), why don't you enroll yourself in the local JC, take some engineering courses, then decide for yourself?
Or are you incapable of doing that?
Just out of curiosity, what is
YOUR
field of expertise? I'll bet I could find a few hundred people willing to tell you that your birth was faked, and that your parents (who really aren't your parents) lied to you about where you came from.
I mean, you realize that storks deliver babies right? Forget that nonsense about child birth, it's actually a magic fairy living up in the clouds with a flock of white birds. She waves her magic wand, and POOF a kid appears; with a parachute all packed up and ready to go.
There've been some legal issues recently because she and Santa Claus have been competeing for air-space during Christmas-Eve for deliveries. It's in all the papers didn't you know?
In all seriousnous if you can't balance a chemical equation, solve a simple acceleration problem, or understand some of the other basic frundamental laws of nature, then maybe you ought to shut up.
I think it's called "owning up." I read about that somewhere by someone very credible. ahem -
ta_naemhni — 16 years ago(June 09, 2009 11:19 AM)
"insulting the plethora of test pilots who tested technology platforms by putting their lives on the line by flying rockets with wings."
That's for sure. By way of comparison: I'm an IT professional myself, and I have a few industry certifications (A+, Microsoft Certified Professional, and a few others) that I naturally list on my rsum. To get those certificates, I had to spend dozens and dozens of hours studying, plus thousands of dollars in exam fees and study materials. It was a lot of time, effort, and money.
I once met someone who asked me whether I really had those certificates, or whether I was just saying that I did. I am not a violent person, but even so, the minute those words left his lips, literally the first thing that went thru my head was an image of me punching his lights out. And that's just over some certifications. I can't imagine how furious I'd be if I were an Apollo astronaut hearing about moon landing conspiracy theories. It's a hell of a lot harder (and more dangerous) to be an astronaut than it is to be an IT professional. -
hueydoc — 21 years ago(February 01, 2005 07:10 PM)
Attn: wamies; According to clavius.org, Ralph Rene "often claims to be an engineer, although he admits he has no credentials and is self-taught." (everyone should trust an expert that's "self-taught", right?) And checkout http://www.clavius.org/kaysing.html for more detailed info on "Mr." Kaysing. Look at the sky in a picture of any night-time sporting event in a brightly lit open air sports arena. If you don't see stars, the game MUST have been played at area 51, no matter what the caption says. CALL BILL KAYSING, IT'S A SPORTS CONSPIRACY!!
The conspiracy theorists are conspiring against me! -
lseybold-2 — 16 years ago(September 06, 2009 09:43 AM)
Of course the moon landings are fake. If we landed on the moon 40 years ago, then why can't we do it again in 2009? Because NASA still hasn't figured out how to safely land on the moon.
Do you think that NASA has the same budget they had in the 1960s? Well, they don't.
"I am a collage of unaccounted for brush strokes, and I am all random!"
-
HapHazzard — 16 years ago(September 08, 2009 05:32 PM)
Of course the moon landings are fake. If we landed on the moon 40 years ago, then why can't we do it again in 2009? Because NASA still hasn't figured out how to safely land on the moon.
Stupidity on this level truly amazes me. Here's the thing - the satellite in orbit around the moon right now has imaged the landing sites just a couple of months ago. It's even picked up the tracks the astronauts made in the dust. These photos are being examined by scientists all over the world and are also in the public domain - and none have been shown to be anything other than genuine photos. Kind of kills the moronic argument once and for all.
It's a tender love song, very beautiful. {Whats it called?} Lick my love pump. -
NebLWeffah — 16 years ago(September 18, 2009 10:07 PM)
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)!! HALLEH-FREAKIN'-LOOYAH!!!!!
Now maybe all the nut cases will shut up for awhile. The latest image of Apollo 12 landing site shows the LM decent stage clearly with shadow, the Surveyor 3 in the crater right where it was supposed to be and Pete Conrad's and Al Bean's tracks. Very cool pictures actually.
Look here:
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/ -
videojohn — 16 years ago(October 09, 2009 02:20 PM)
Dear Hap;
Very good point there, Sir.
Here's what (I believe) got
this all started to begin with,
as I used to live in La Canada
where many of the JPL folks do
and had 'first hand' knowledge.
Were the Moon "landings" faked??
In a word NO. Our spacecraft and
Astronauhts walked on it as well.
Various "Ham Radio" stations heard
it & recorded (world wide) the audio
at the time. This could NOT ever
be "faked".Were the Moon "landings" faked in
photographic image?? I'm sure
some were, for a variety of reasons.- Actual photos distorted, damaged,
lost, or destroyed by accident. - Photos were inhanced/altered for
the creation of foreign propaganda. - Photos were altered for the purpose
of "national security" etc. - Photos were altered/created for a
variety of presentations to Congress
to gain funding for the program.
The two topics are different.
The film titled; Capricorn One (1977),
was for entertainment only and was a
story to make money for the Producers.
"That's all folks"; Buggs Bunny.
Happy trails to all - Actual photos distorted, damaged,
-
stratdax — 16 years ago(November 09, 2009 04:29 PM)
Yes, they landed on the moon. Any amateur astrologist with gear could track the ship. They also left a retro-reflector on the surface of the moon that people and universities all over the world began using immediately.
And the arguements saying "well why haven't we been back?" is stupid. Not only because they went back lots of times, butI've been to Sweden once, but I'm likely never going to go back does that mean I've NEVER been there? No, of course it doesn't. -
standrkm — 15 years ago(March 13, 2011 04:26 PM)
What is certain is that Kubrick and the Apollo 11 astronauts did make an alternate moon landing. NASA airbrushes out certain things from their photo's, never has a straight answer, calls anything resembling a ufo water crystals, and has put out obvious manipulated photos of the moon. This is fact and it should be well known. Did you know that they even have a 20 second delay when showing live television that is used to control what information gets out? Oh and they taped over the first moon landing ever because of shortage of tapes, or just plain out can't find the originals, lol.
In a film called "something funny happened on the way to the moon" you get to see the Apollo 11 astronauts making the earth seem further away while making their way to the moon and the date doesn't add up with their trajectory. In many photo's you can see photo tampering done in the exact same way Kubrick did 2001.
Here's a nice article:
http://www.assassinationscience.com/HowKubrickFakedtheMoonLandings-1.pdf
I don't know if all manned missions were faked, I really don't know. But maybe the initial moon landing was or was atleast done in a studio just in case of failure. I see that as being more plausible. I don't care about the shadows, the waving flag, maybe that's how it is on the moon, I've never been there. It's the way the moon dust acts that I see as something otherworldly. I don't know how they could have faked the way that stuff moves.
If reincarnated,I'd return to Earth as a killer virus to lower population levels.
-Prince Phillip -
lseybold-2 — 14 years ago(April 12, 2011 07:56 AM)
In a film called "something funny happened on the way to the moon" you get to see the Apollo 11 astronauts making the earth seem further away while making their way to the moon and the date doesn't add up with their trajectory.
Two sides to every story
http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny7.html
"I am a collage of unaccounted-for brushstrokes, and I am all random!"
-
marktarnovetsky — 13 years ago(October 14, 2012 11:30 AM)
yes of course they were faked. physical life can not travel in space its scientifically not possible. you should rewatch or watch The Shining, that movie is actually about Kubrick himself faking the moon landings.
good question!