OP- YOU CANT EVEN SPELL,and a opinion is like an ass*le everyone has one .
-
Jumbotron — 10 years ago(March 08, 2016 03:10 PM)
I've just seen the movie for the first time as well. And considering it's been over 35 years from its release date, and that it had an estimated budget of $650,000, I honestly think they did a terrific job with this movie.
-
-
t-viktor212 — 9 years ago(May 11, 2016 10:41 AM)
I see your point, but on the other hand it's late 70s, and two years earlier John Williams composed that fantastic score that is the Star Wars score. I think the problem was that they couldn't afford a good composer, let's remember that this film had quite limited funds
-
T-eschberger — 9 years ago(August 08, 2016 08:22 AM)
People blindly praise this movie more out of nostalgia and the influence it had on other films than for the actual film itself.
I mean, it's a very sloppy movie. It has no real plot or theme until the third act. It meanders along from scene to scene without much focus on any one character or idea. All we know is that it's kind of the end of the word, there are gangs and cops and they're fighting. Hell, for the first act Max can't even be called the protagonist. Goose had more focus than Max. So it baffles me that certain fans love to rip on Fury Road for not being about Max when he wasn't the clear protagonist since his first film.
The whole revenge aspect of the movie is a 20 minute ordeal. It's not given much time to have any impact. It just happens and then Max is killing people. And the revenge itself is pretty lackluster too. All he does is run some people off the road, really.
Where the film excels is the action. And that's it.
The sequels are leagues better. And yes, that included Thunderdome.