The director's daughter…
-
SkaterDave — 11 years ago(March 31, 2015 12:17 AM)
That's just ridiculous. He had no reason to make up a story like that. Besides that, how do you know that certain directors and film crews then to lie a lot? Do you work in the business? Have you been in many films?
-
robert-103-233419 — 11 years ago(September 22, 2014 06:22 AM)
Yeh, this is kinda weird tbh, although I don't personally think that its that weird letting his daughter act in a rape scene (it isn't real after all). What I do find odd is the nepotism in casting her for the role in the first place. She is clearly a woeful actress (sorry, but its true). Admittedly I might have been a little aggressive about this in the review I did of the film (
http://www.gashfilms.com/filmreviews/excalibur/
;)) but yeh, really bad bit of casting.
Also worth pointing out that his nephew Charley Boorman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charley_Boorman
also plays the weird young version of Mordred. Despite the nepotism here this bit of casting actually works well as the young Charley looks quite, erm incesty.
Katarina Boorman cast as Igraine though is just bad. It really stretches credibility when she is supposedly the cause of Uther abandoning the treaty and does
that
dance -
duke-verity — 10 years ago(August 05, 2015 04:18 AM)
The film didn't invent the story of the ravishment of Igrayne, it's there in Malory's
Le Morte D'Arthur
. It's the centuries-old original creation myth behind the Arthurian legend - the backstory of how King Arthur came to be conceived and born.
This is a fictitious scene with brief nudity featuring three actors. It's not some degenerate, morally reprehensible and pornographic slice of filth. People do rather need to calm down and try to understand the scene within the context of the film.
Katrine Boorman has no regrets about having filmed this scene. She recently made a television documentary about her father, his work, and their extended family. Charley Boorman (who of course played young Mordred, as well as having acted in his father's other films) appeared in this documentary, and brother and sister chatted together about what it was like to act for their dad.
They are a very close (and
very
eccentric) family, with no particular hangups about nudity. All of Boorman's children hail from an artistic, almost hippy commune background (born and raised in the era of the
Age of Aquarius
), where they ran around naked together as children and posed
au naturel
for artist relatives etc. They never saw anything shameful in that. There was nothing dirty or sexual about it. As a result they grew up relatively unihibited about such things, and had no qualms about acting in their dad's films.
Katrine was seventeen when she did
Excalibur
, but is emphatic that she was never exploited or coerced into doing anything she felt uncomfortable with. She remains very close to her dad and family to this day, and now makes her living as a photographer and documentary film maker. She has no issues about having played Igrayne, or of having shot this particular scene. So why do some viewers today have such issues with it? -
lazarillo — 10 years ago(February 02, 2016 05:56 AM)
She wasn't raped in real-life and even in the context of the movie she thought the guy was her husband and did not really UNWILLINGLY have sex with him. That's not quite the same thing as forcible rape. Seeing this movie as a teenager, I was just impressed he did it in full armor.
It is kinda weird to film your teen daughter in a nude sex scene, rape or not, but a few European directors have done itDario and Asia Argento in "Trauma", Serg and Charlotte Gainsbourg in "Charlotte Forever", and Andrew Birkin and his son and niece (Charlotte Gainsbourg again) in "The Cement Garden". These are just MOVIES though after all, and I don't pass judgment on their real-life relationships. I also don't think Americans puritanical weirdness towards sex and nudity is necessarily any healthier. . .
"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"