Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Shotguns!

Shotguns!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    IMDb User

    This message has been deleted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      JDsivraj — 18 years ago(May 07, 2007 05:43 PM)

      All the gases needed to make a gun go boom are in the smokeless powder.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        Bart_Decaux — 18 years ago(May 14, 2007 03:20 PM)

        Gunpowder is a monopropellant, which just means it's all self-contained and doesn't need anything beyond itself to burn. It isn't actually oxygenated as such, it relies on potassium nitrate to oxidize.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            marsodyssey2010 — 18 years ago(November 02, 2007 12:23 PM)

            Beam weapons wouldn't fire forever unless they had a infinite power source, the energy would eventually dissipate. Even in space.
            English Language Anime: Dub it, don't pervert it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              Bart_Decaux — 18 years ago(November 26, 2007 04:34 PM)

              Okay, let me clarify: a beam weapon would fire forever until it encountered something sufficient to interact with which would absorb its energy.
              Given that certain energy sources in the universe have been travelling for many, many millions of years without dissipating to any appreciable degree, I think we can assume that a beam weapon's output could be rattling around in the cosmos for a long enough time for it to be largely irrelevant to whatever it was we were originally aiming for and why we did so.
              Scientifically, that's not quite "forever", true, but that's a bit of a nitpick in this context, surely? 😉

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #47

                marsodyssey2010 — 18 years ago(November 29, 2007 11:11 AM)

                You're thinking of radiated energy. A beam would loose focus with distance and would eventually disperse to the point of nothingness. You would have a 10nm laser at the focusing lens, but by the time that it had traveled any appreciable distance it would be much wider and much weaker.
                Shine a flashlight at a near wall and a far wall and you will see that the image on the far wall will be larger and darker. It's the same principle even with lasers.
                English Language Anime: Dub it, don't pervert it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #48

                  Bart_Decaux — 18 years ago(December 07, 2007 02:24 PM)

                  I'll bow to your knowledge on this one; I'm afraid I'm something of an amateur scientist and have to admit I don't know about the subtleties between the different forms of energy. I wasn't aware that lasers can lose focus too.
                  That said, lasers can and do work effectively over- at least to us- rather large distances, surely? I know that laser weapons with enough power to take out any threats militarily aren't practical yet, but let's imagine a high-tech, compact yet powerful hypothetical future one capable of blasting a hole in a person. Even if such a weapon were to exist, wouldn't it still be more dangerous to fire one of these in the relatively closed surroundings of the colony than a shotgun which loses its effective range much more quickly?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #49

                    DetectiveBurst — 18 years ago(June 24, 2007 08:22 PM)

                    Shotguns worked perfectly. I like the fact that they weren't running around with phasers or crap like that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #50

                      IMDb User

                      This message has been deleted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups