What purpose did this character serve?
-
eddieinportland — 14 years ago(October 30, 2011 03:58 PM)
Pierce didn't die. He was just burned really bad. And after he left the hospital. He movied to New Mexico and open up a fast food chicken restaurant chain. And on the side he sales meth to make ends meat.
"Like I know where to find people in this bum beep town" Jessica Hamby -
WyldeGoose — 13 years ago(December 12, 2012 09:37 PM)
I know why. Unlike the other idiots as of 12/12/12 who didn't answer this, because I've been in command of troops.
Because S#it happens. When you are responsible for living beings under your command, s#it happens. And it maybe due to decisions that you make, as was with Brian Moreland, who I would serve in combat any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
When directors and producers use actors, it's principally for the effect of the movie.
The effect of this situation was to reinforce the fact that this was serious. That Cadet Major Moreland was now in charge, and that he was responsible. -
WyldeGoose — 13 years ago(December 13, 2012 09:02 AM)
Well thank you for the answer, WyldeGoose, and thanks for all you do for our country.
In other words, J.C. was more of a plot device than he was a character?
Thank you, and yes, he was a plot device. The point of his death was to underscore for the audience that this need not have happened, that it was Moreland and his decisions that led to this outcome.
At no point did Moreland even ask himself what he hoped to accomplish? Every commander has got to ask that question all the time. What are your objectives and how are you going to achieve them? What did Moreland hope to gain? Did he think that the school would be saved? Did he think that General Bache would somehow escape some culpability for the death of that kid? By commandeering the armory and blocking off the school, all he did was make mistake after mistake after mistake, with no tangible goal or purpose to anything he was doing.
When I said s#it happens, what I mean is that Murphy's Law is always in effect for a commander. Something is always going to go wrong. A commander has to be able to mitigate the flaws and the wrong things that invariably happen. Moreland did not do that.
It seemed to me that Moreland was caught up in an ideal that didn't evaluate reality as it was. -
camerica1978 — 12 years ago(November 29, 2013 10:02 AM)
He died, because he was black. In a lot of action, suspense, drama, and horror movies, the screenwriters/producers/directors often kill off the black characters, while white characters have a much higher survival rate. I guess a lot of movie producing people see black characters the same way Star Trek writers saw red shirted security personnel. Their deaths illustrate to the audience the danger of a situation in the movie, without having to resort to killing someone more important to the movie's storyline. So the next time you watch an action, suspense, drama, or horror movie, if the white main character has a black buddy, that black buddy is probably a goner.