Which is the better franchise, this or FRIDAY THE 13th?
-
carpediemalready — 10 years ago(April 18, 2015 07:30 AM)
I think this is a much better franchise! I think the dream element makes NoES much more original and creative, Freddy's back story, all of it it keeps me interested a lot more whereas Jason seems pretty boring by comparison. The idea of something that preys on you when you fall asleep and molested and killed children in life? That is much more terrifying to me. The nightmare scenes and special effects make NoES more visually exciting, and the scenes when Freddy is creeping after someone in the dark most of us have had an experience of being followed in the night by someone creepy like that.
Friday the 13th has a much more basic feel to it, and not as many layers. It's okay, but it doesn't interest me nearly as much as NoES. Friday is more on par with Sleepaway Camp in my mind. Halloween, which has a similar slow-walking slasher villain as Friday, is superior to Friday the 13th in my opinion.
"We all go a little mad sometimes." - Norman Bates -
Zarathustras_Crown — 10 years ago(April 26, 2015 12:28 PM)
Apples and oranges to be honestboth these guys were people I grew up with (along with Michael Myers from the Halloween series), but they're treated in very distinct ways. Freddy is a much more "savvy" character, he tends to play with his victims almost in a cat and mouse style and has more of an overt "intent". As such there tends to be a little more showmanship in Freddy's stuff, it's almost a self-referential wink to an unseen audience. Jason (and Michael for that matter) is much more a simple forceI always thought of them as being almost more akin to an animal in a sense like a bear or shark. Look at Jason, he generally doesn't range much out of his own territory, and there feels like there's less maliciousness in his killing. Sure, a shark attack is horrific and brutal and gory and all, but you don't really "blame" the shark, it's just what they do. So it's much more a simple force of nature with Jason where Freddy feels more like an actual murderer with intent, you know he's aware of what he's doing where with Jason he almost feels like a massive, immensely strong child who may cause all this horror and such but he's just doing what he does.
So like I said, I can't really say I find either one "better" than the other, they're two really different approaches to the whole concept of killer. I will say that I was much more fond of Freddy earlier on in the series, Nightmare 1&2 in particular and (in whatever way it is him) New Nightmare. Friday the 13th though I generally stuck with it (with a stumble here and there such as in part 5) up to around part 7 because, let's be honest, there isn't any way for Jason to be making wise-cracks about the power glove and making pop culture jokes in the same way Freddy ended up doing. Love 'em both though.
+Charos+
"I have often laughed at weaklings
who thought themselves good because
they had no claws." -
ThiefOfStars — 10 years ago(June 27, 2015 03:19 AM)
NOES by light years!
Even after the NOES movies stop being scary, you can still enjoy them as dark fantasy movies.
https://www.youtube.com/user/ThiefOfStars -
ollyoxenfree1997 — 10 years ago(July 02, 2015 02:56 PM)
The original ANOES>>>Friday the 13th, I haven't seen all of the sequels to each but overall I find the concept of Freddie more interesting than Jason. Mrs Voorhees was a good character (especially when you go into it expecting Jason), but she's only in the first movie.
-
cooldudeonice — 10 years ago(July 30, 2015 07:24 PM)
when i first watched the original i had seen the first friday 13th movie with mrs voorhees as the killer, i didnt see parts 2 and 3 until i had seen all the nightmares religiously so i guess il always have a bigger place in my heart for freddy then jason, i just prefer nightmares theme to the overall dull and depressing theme of friday 13th but i class the first three as classics in their own right and the third was my fave, it was great fun and had the best jason imo, four i can take it or leave it five i never waatched and part six i thought was pretty cool fun what with all the 80s nostalgia,the seventh movie i acc really liked and jason was a lot more brutal in that one as opposed to the zombie superhero he was in parts six, but tbh i am one of those guys who preferred human retarded jason as over zombie superhero jason, jason in manhatton is a love hate thing and i have yet to see jason goes to hell, jason x was terrible once he became a cyborg, it reminded me of that old corny cheesy van damme movie called cyborg, if i am watching a movie and my brain switches of and starts playing scenes from a crappy van damme flick then it has got to be bad, i guess the cyborg thing came into it too, jason being a cyborg reminded me that van damme was once in a movie called cyborg, the last time this happened was when i saw robocop 3, my brain switched of and next thing i know i am watching maximum risk, a whole pile of beep starring none other than the wonderful van damme! i saw that crappy bruce willis movie in the cinema with my old girlfriend, you know the one with all the robots and beep well next thing you know van damme is fighting with mickey rourke in the coloseum in rome and there is a tiger involved somehow, oh yeah and a baby in a basket and i am watching double team with denis rodman instead of bruce willis fighting robots in whatever crap that was called. although it gets pretty cheesy towards the end i have yet to have a van damme episode while i watch any of the nightmares, they are fun and whacky and never make me drift of, they always have my attention and there is some great humour in there too, the halloween movies too were also great fun, i just find teh fridays to be halloween clones but the first three are great i think they should have ended it there.
-
zeeboe82 — 10 years ago(September 08, 2015 10:20 AM)
Jason scared me as a kid and gave me nightmares and he is still scary. I love Jason, his backstory, the kills, the scenery of Camp Crystal Lake, some of the ladies and the nostalgia.
Having typed that, with the exception of "Freddy vs. Jason" and the 2009 reboot of "Friday the 13th", all the "Friday the 13th" films are glorified, B-rated, grindhouse, cheesy piles of trash that ripped off the "Halloween" franchise. The original Jason movies are filled with horrible acting, corny lines and virtually no continuity. Jason's look and sometimes even his weight and height changes in almost every film and he always kills a new group of characters. It's like every "Friday the 13th" film is a remake and there's too many of them.
I'm not a fan of most of the characters, the stories and some of the acting and I struggle to finish the films because I get so bored, but I watch those films for fun only, not for serious horror-viewing. That is where the reboot comes in.
To answer the question - I prefer the Elm Street films. I only like parts 1 and 2, but that's two more films I like then the original "Friday the 13th" films. -
sliat_1981 — 10 years ago(November 14, 2015 04:47 PM)
Friday the 13th was virtually the same movie each time.
Jason revives.
Jason goes around killing teens one by one.
Teens have sex, occasional flashing of boobies.
Someone discovers murders and instantly is killed so they can't report it it.
Final heroine puts up fight that none of the other teens were able to.
Jason is killed.
Pretty much the plot lines for all of the movies -
brandonhelee — 10 years ago(November 16, 2015 11:30 PM)
Well as a fan of the whole franchise and love all 9 films in the franchise yes even Part's 2,5,6 & The Remake I can fully heartily say that this is much more superior.With Friday the 13th as much as I enjoy each entry for what they are I find most of the films to be terrible films not that I hate them or anything I just find most of them to be awful and they all I mildly enjoy.
With Friday the 13th.
The original I think is overrated it's a poorly done murder mystery film with some enjoyable characters and some decent frightening scenes.
Part 2 is just a a worse film that just uses the original as a template for it's story and character it's rather a lazy film but still its fun.
Part 3 uses a terrible 3D gimmick that ruins the flow of a otherwise great flick.
Part 4 is a terribly overrated sequel that is lazy.
Part 5 is filled with way too much filler scenes and just doesn't make all that much senses in the long run with it's plot.
Part 6 is super fun but introducing supernatural Zombie Jason elements too way the grit,the seriousness & coolness of the previous films and proceeding films.
Part 7 the carrie like girl and the complete rehashing of The Final Chapter took me straight out of the film.
Part 8 just is way too long and the whole Manhattan thing is just cheap bodycount thing and not for a porpoise of good scares.
Part 9 the first few minutes we're cool but the rest was just way too absurd and make Part 6's mistakes that it brought to the series look tame in comparison.
Part 10 by this point I'm drained by the stupidity and endless bad decisions the franchise has token to even complain about a simple Jason film in space.
Part 11 is pretty cool it has Jason and Freddy fighting together of which is very fun and cool.
The remake is the best installment yet it has realism,scares & a overall vibe that the original series should've gone in way better than the rest.
With A Nightmare on Elm Street I have zero problems they all are amazing and I love em all. -
GreenGoblinsOckVenom86 — 9 years ago(September 13, 2016 01:11 PM)
I like both franchises. Both have their terrible entries. Nightmare Part 4 and onwards got both sillier and creepier at the same. Freddy got pretty comedic but then there's the fact it turns out Freddy kept the souls of everyone he killed in his dreamworld. That's way too creepy. I like Part 6 but only because I liked them going more into Freddy's back story. Plus some of the really comedic stuff like a guy getting turned into a video game and then his body bouncing up and down all cartoony. That's funny. I also liked Freddy's daughter and the doctor she worked with.
I admit I liked the first 4 about equally but it does go downhill after that. I liked Zombie Jason and those movies were fun but just not as good as the previous. Jason goes to Hell is terrible and barely even feels like a Friday film. Then there's all sorts of nonsensical stuff like the Bounty Hunter having to break that guy's hand to tell him about Jason or Jason shaving someone before possessing them. Or at the very beginning of the movie where the Coroner sees Jason's heart beating and then eats it. The only really great part is the cool scene of Jason getting back to his normal form at the end and then getting pulled into Hell by those demons along with the very end where Freddy grabs Jason's mask but most of it is just dumb.
I actually liked Freddy Vs. Jason as much as the first 3 Nightmare films and the first few Friday the 13th movies. It was good to have that made when it was and although I wished we could've had a sequel to it.
I didn't care for the remake of Friday the 13th (didn't even ask for it to be honest). I also didn't like the Nightmare remake which doesn't give you any kind of connection to most of the characters unlike the first film. Now I hear they are doing another Friday film. I might go see it but I will have to see good previews.
1, 2 Freddy's coming for you. 3, 4 better lock your door. -
Confection_Pictures — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 10:16 PM)
Love both but NOES for its versatility and quality. Friday the 13th is fun but most of them are guilty pleasures, with only 4 and 6 being legitimately good, especially 6 for doing something different with the formula. NOES, even at its worse, beats any horror franchise.
Want three steaks? My mistake. Four steaks.