Why the crap do I see 'Flight of the navigator '2011????????
-
cjsks — 15 years ago(June 02, 2010 08:38 AM)
Yeah, I share your worry there I'm afraid that it will become more heavily saturated with type casts, overuse of CGI, and "cheese". Probably to be expected.
On the other hand, I would love to see Disney nudge this slightly in the other direction, by toning down the cheese factor of the original just a peg, i.e., just a hair less of the Pee-Wee Herman type stuff, and maybe bump up the cool factor on those little aliens that were along for the ride.
It could still be totally kid friendly and simultaneously cool enough that parents out there will be happy to play it again and again. WALL-e was a good example of how well this approach works. Every parent I speak to who has seen that movie loved it. And kids do too!
The best of both worlds -
megaskunk — 15 years ago(July 08, 2010 05:51 AM)
The reason I need to see this movie again was it's absolutely incredible special effects of that full silver spaceship.
So what can hollywood nowadays deliver else than better effects, and they aren't really better, to make this movie better?
Ah wait.. they don't want to improve it, they just need some money.
Stupid me
(problem solved) -
Tcb83 — 15 years ago(December 04, 2010 05:42 PM)
I will happily embrace a remake if Disney brings Sarah Jessica Parker in for at least a cameo. Doesn't have to be as her Carolyn McAdams character, simply having in for a brief appearance would be a nice homage to the original.
-
— 4 years ago(November 06, 2021 10:46 AM)https://imdb.com/title/tt1444308
“Call a SPADE, a SPADE; and a TRANNY, a TRANNY, or an IT!!!”.
"THAT'S SOME BAD
SHIT
,
HARRY
!".