I just started rewatching for the first time after like 20 years when I saw it as a child and I kinda thought it would b
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Highlander
the_troof — 9 years ago(February 09, 2017 07:45 PM)
I just started rewatching for the first time after like 20 years when I saw it as a child and I kinda thought it would be like a silly moment of reminiscince - and it is to a certain degree but I cant believe how good the cinematography is. the lighting and the framing and some angles of shots are ridicolously nice.
anyone else have that feeling after watching again after a long while? -
Trax-3 — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 08:37 PM)
Yeah, it's probably the most competent part of the movie.
www.ipetitions.com/petition/petition-to-keep-the-imdb-messageboards-going -
Corwin — 3 years ago(January 07, 2023 11:18 PM)
Just rewatching with my boys. The cinematography is good; Scotland looks gorgeous.
The story is still good, it draws you in.
The special effects and some of the acting, well, that holds up not as well, not at all.
Still, an enjoyable film. -
hungryinconway — 3 years ago(January 08, 2023 12:07 AM)
The main "hero" is very bad actor, one of the worst I have seen in a major feature film. Kurgan is so good he saved the entire movie and completely overshadowed Sean Connery, who was also excellent in his role.
The Lion does not give a fuck. Bring. More. Sheep. -
bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(January 08, 2023 05:34 AM)
No, it’s good.
I was watching the other day on my big screen was shocked how good it and futuristic it looked and was surprised how this classic masterpiece didnt do that good at the box.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.