In alot of ways, it really sucked. But…
-
Littlebitsofgaming — 13 years ago(March 14, 2013 08:12 AM)
well i disagree in that the sword fights were bad. i mean they had Bob Anderson as the sword master. the guy is legendary. he was Darth Vader.
Ahhhh Star Wars, another film with inept sword swinging.
Does not matter how great Bob may have been, if the actor can not utilize his teachings, then it just does not worksee this film for proof.
Shakespeare could mutter his entire work into the ears of a monkey, does not mean the monkey could become a successful playwright.
And so, God came forth and proclaimed widescreen is the best.
Sony 16:9 -
Herreken — 12 years ago(July 23, 2013 03:10 AM)
Inept sword swinging? I thought the only film in the original Star Wars Trilogy with crappy sword choreography was A New Hope. Episodes V & VI had good choreography.
I don't think the sword fighting in Highlander was that bad.
DISPLAY thy breasts, my Julia! -
cockroachcharlie — 11 years ago(November 07, 2014 06:13 PM)
A presence. Good way of putting it. I remember Day of Wrath where his acting is Meh at best. And he has worse films. But dammit, he is an actor that can make just about any role LOOK awesome.
In a way he's like an action hero without the action. He doesn't need great acting because he simply looks the part. -
HellboundHero — 13 years ago(March 10, 2013 05:08 PM)
Christopher Lambert, eh. But he still IS Connor McCleod to me. Just like William Shatner sucks, but he'll always be Captain James T. Kirk to me.
That's pretty much how I feel. For better or worse, the actors define the characters. -
ChazzJazz — 12 years ago(January 21, 2014 06:00 AM)
Lambert's lack of Spoken English limits him somewhat as an actor, but yes he has a presence
http://myimpressionz.tk -
thedude_85 — 12 years ago(April 12, 2013 02:57 AM)
"this along with The Terminator , are two of my favorite films of all time. they are the ones ive watched the most the past 25+ years."
I agree Donutpower. I've always thought of Highlander and the Terminator as kind of companion pieces. One is about a man from the past, the other about a man from the future; both with almost unstoppable and really memorable adversaries. Also both are quite cheesy, fairly low budget 80s movies, with several (inferior in my opinion) sequels. I think they still stand the test of time and bring back a lot of nostalgia for people who were first getting into films in the 80s. -
benm2k9 — 12 years ago(October 21, 2013 01:19 AM)
I agree, the kurgans scenes in the motel are very similar to arnies scenes in T1, right down to his attire, the creepy synth music and the fact its a run down dingy place.
I taught you everything you know, but not everything I know. -
sth78 — 12 years ago(January 20, 2014 01:52 PM)
Terminator
's initial sequel (T2) wasn't inferior. It stands out as one of the very few sequels that was actually better than the original movie (
Godfather II
and
The French Connection II
were also arguably better than their predecessors). But the other two were inferior, the 3rd being the worst. However, they were not blatantly bad. Both were decent, and the 4th installment was actually a quite good action movie; but as a Terminator movie, it lacked quite a bit.
Highlander
's sequels were, on the other hand, a pure and utter crap fest. -
dtcrocbattle — 12 years ago(March 31, 2014 06:54 AM)
I never seen The Terminator (or this movie for that matter) as cheesy. I just assumed that anything laughable in Highlander was done on accident.
No Number is best. 3 builds better than 2. 2 loves better than 1 and 1 mind is better than 3. -
tenantennae — 12 years ago(October 21, 2013 11:40 PM)
While i strongly disagree on some points, i understand where you're coming from.
To me what makes this movie great is that it's all over the map, yet it works.
It's everything from action movie to historical romance to crime story to pure fantasy to purely ridiculous cheese. But what's wrong with cheese if you're having fun?
It goes from dark and mysterious to not taking itself seriously at all in a split second, and back again, but never skips a beat.
In short, it's entertaining as hell in every which way.
It is a truly original, one-of-kind film that let's your imagination and your emotions run wild. It's also a product of its time; 80s to the bone, and makes me very, very nostalgic.
This movie has it all, and I feel no guilt for the pleasure. -
dannyjobee — 10 years ago(February 06, 2016 09:35 PM)
It has been a few years since your post, but I completely agree. it just, works faults and all.
You missed out the soundtrack though, that absolutely makes a massive contribution.
It is a bad film, not so bad its good, it's just bad, however it works in every way a film should.
It has gravitas, it distracts you from it's cracks, it engulfs you in it's world, such a bizarre yet beautiful example of different worlds colliding forming a pure 80's piece of art.
It stands the test of time too.
The creator did not truly understand his craft, the screenwriter did not, Christopher lambert does not, but they fluked this one, it is just something special.
I always think Robocop, Highlander, Terminator 2, Commando, Predator, Total recall, late 80's early 90's action pieces. Terminator 2 is a masterpiece, faultlessly executed, Commando and Predator are transparent mindless yet suspensful action pop corn flicks, Robocop and Total Recall are masterful, intentionally bad where they need to be but more than the sum of their part which is typically intentional by Verhoevan.
But. Highlander wow lightening just struck, everyone was perfectly cast (Clancy Brown!), the soundtrack, the sfx it just works and Queen elevates it.
It does not realise how cheesy and corny it is, it is innocent in its over the top delivery and it is for that exact reason that even the most cynical of viewers just believe in it.
There can be only one.
Everyone has an opinion, people think there's is the only one that matters. That's just my opinion. -
jlleonar-1 — 12 years ago(November 02, 2013 09:16 PM)
AGREED RIDINGXLIGHTING Did anyone else think that building that McCloud and Kurgan have their final battle in was exactly like the interior where Neo and Agent Smith duke it out (horribly) in Matrix Revolutions at the end.. I dunno just seemed like the exact same set which doesn't say much for Revolutions.
Very enjoyable film, OP sucks not this movie
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE -
captainonionpits — 12 years ago(January 21, 2014 12:40 PM)
In a lot of ways, you suck.what a mindless post.
Its an awesome movie period. You dont need to make excuses.
Go kill yourself
What are you? Four?? A mindless reply to a mindless post. Seems fitting. -
NotASpeckOfCereal — 12 years ago(November 06, 2013 08:27 AM)
I watched it last night and still enjoyed it after the mumble-ith viewing, but for the first time I was struck by the fact that it doesn't hold up in places.
For once, I will not complain when one of my favorite films gets a reboot. Hey, at least they waited quite a few years.
Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out -
Superunknovvn — 12 years ago(January 19, 2014 05:02 PM)
i just saw it again after a long, long and I have to say the direction was impressive. not the direction of the actors, but the angles and camera movements (although I can see why Tarantino apparenty referred to the director as a poor man's Ridley Scott).
"We learned more from a three minute record than we ever learned in school" -
twofacetoo — 12 years ago(February 13, 2014 03:46 AM)
'Highlander' is the kind of guilty pleasure I don't feel too guilty about.
It's like a movie like 'The Room'. People can admit that it's bad, and often openly do, but there is still a group of people who enjoy it for just how bad it is.
In this case, I enjoy it because yeah, it does suck at times, but the good moments are like gold-coated diamonds that fell from the sky. They're just so damn good they outweigh the bad stuff by just the tiniest amount. -
CptHowdy87 — 12 years ago(February 26, 2014 05:33 PM)
Can someone please actually explain what is supposedly so bad about the sword fighting? They weren't using those prissy dueling swords but gigantic heavy swords which take a lot of strength to even hold let alone swing around.
I doubt any of you even have a clue about actual sword fighting anyway besides what you've seen in other movies.