This message has been deleted.
-
the_darkness_of_poetic_humor — 17 years ago(August 20, 2008 03:42 AM)
This is really funny. I've never seen many cheesy eighties movies get a long , long post that had five pages like this one.
But if Jerry Lee Lewis can bang his cousin and get a mixed reaction, than this is pretty much nothing(especially since MJ didn't know it was his aunt at the time).
Come on now people. -
the_secret_door — 17 years ago(September 28, 2008 10:05 AM)
Yeah, it would've been even naughtier if Howard was actually his unclethat would've justified the outrage on this board, at leastlol. That would've been great. (cuz Vera would still not be a blood relative, and it would've been more justifiably uncomfortable for Brantley).
But they went to great lengths to say that even Howard is barely related to Brantley. Therefore, the taboo is not even really a taboo.
This thread didn't need another post, but I added one anyway. Ha!
you watched it, you cant unwatch it -
KrisRuz — 17 years ago(October 03, 2008 01:22 PM)
It's funny that this stupid question got so many responses. Obviously the original post is just by some dumb prudish New York kid who thinks everything is "gross." Relax people, obviously him banging his wife was fine
And she was pretty hot. -
mjfluver4 — 17 years ago(December 10, 2008 03:40 PM)
No, it's
not
disgusting! Here's why:- They were not related by blood!
- They were only tangentially related, if even that.
- One thing that Biblical creationists and evolutions can agree on: Every human being on this planet is related to each other! We all have a common ancestor, somewhere.
- Just because Brantley felt that it was wrong, it doesn't mean that he was right.
- Technically, if Alice and Bob were both half-siblings of Carol - but Alice and Carol have a common mother, while Bob and Carol have a common father - Alice and Bob wouldn't really be related. Thus, it'd be legal for them to wed. Brantley and Vera are even less related than the hypothetical Alice and Bob are.
You see, in the beginning, all was well. There was harmony. There was balance.
~ Alex P Keaton
-
boogles — 16 years ago(September 20, 2009 03:22 PM)
Yeah I did find it a bit disturbing. Even though they were not blood related it was a bit disturbing. It didn't sit well in a sort of family film. I know in the US it is PG 13 but that is still a bit too strong for this type of movie.
In the UK it is a PG. What with this and the composing the couple in the other room romping and the couple doing it on the photocopier!!!! -
Silverknight81 — 16 years ago(October 01, 2009 03:18 PM)
I don't get you people. It happen often in real life, more then you think, it's no big deal if it's wanted by both.
the Big problem should be the fact that he was sexually abused and even assaulted. He never wanted this, she came very strong and never quit. What if it was an uncle and his young niece in the exact same situation? -
furball_xl5 — 15 years ago(August 23, 2010 05:28 AM)
It's bad lol you can tell first of all he was disturbed and thats why he didn't do it again.
He did do it again, even tho he knew she was his aunt. Theres a bit where hes tryin to sleep when the couple are at it next door. The door knocks and its her, she ses she "heard him calling her telepathically" and rushed over. The next scene, she is standing getting dressed and he is in the bed, which would suggest they've just did it. -
c2colton — 15 years ago(January 07, 2011 07:42 PM)
ummm, she was hot as hell. ready willing and very ready. I sure as hell would jump at that.
Besides who has not had a crush on a member of their family? before or after they knew they were related (either by blood or marriage)? -
lil_miss_independent92 — 13 years ago(November 03, 2012 09:18 AM)
Why the hell are so many people getting into a pissing match over this topic? Seriouslyit's a movieand it's not even the biggest part of the moviePeople have different opinionswhat's wrong with that? There is no need to act all childish and over defensive about a part of a movie