All you guys who posted posted reviews of this film Why the hell were your ratings so low? Stop ranking films on the cri

[fgadmin]

fabyur51 — 17 years ago(November 23, 2008 08:45 AM)

I love this movie with every fibre of my being, but I gave it a one just to push it into the bottom 100 where it belongs and will get the recognition it deserves.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

darkbhudda — 17 years ago(December 21, 2008 07:40 AM)

This movie was awesome. The director was good, some great framing shots. But the best bit would have to be it raining after the umbrella opens.

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 16 years ago(December 25, 2009 07:58 AM)

I gave this film a 9 out of 10 for its sheer exquisitely awful high camp schlock value alone.
"We're all part Shatner/And part James Dean/Part Warren Oates/And Steven McQueen"

[fgadmin]

Doom — 11 years ago(February 12, 2015 05:51 AM)

3.4
now.
Wait a minute who am I here?

[fgadmin]

ElectricWarlock — 10 years ago(December 04, 2015 08:15 AM)

It's cheesy and campy but still fun and better than many other movies. I give it a 7/10.

[fgadmin]

kurt7825 — 10 years ago(December 27, 2015 07:05 PM)

bunch of beep idiots

[fgadmin]

Doom — 10 years ago(December 29, 2015 12:41 PM)

3.5
Wait a minute who am I here?

[fgadmin]

FlyingSaucersAreReal — 9 years ago(November 21, 2016 07:24 PM)

It's bad.
Padded out with clips from the first movie. The enjoyment it brings comes completely from laughing at its ineptitude.
-I was born in a crossfire hurricane.

[fgadmin]

Scarecrow-88 — 9 years ago(December 11, 2016 07:41 PM)

When your film is made up of so much footage and Freeman's performance doesn't give you giggles as much as cringe, then that is the reward, a low rating.