It seems to me the diaper changing scene went on for too long and they kept showing the baby's privates when it wasn't n
-
ExplorerDS6789 — 10 years ago(November 07, 2015 08:12 PM)
It's not perverted, only sick, sensitive people like YOU find it perverted.
The whole point of the scene was to show how inexperienced Peter and Michael were with baby care, which is why it took them a while to change the diaper.
If it were a scene with somebody who knew what they were doing, it would've been quicker: take off the dirty diaper, lift the legs, wipe the bottom, put on the clean diaper, and voila. But Peter and Michael are both hesitant, but know it has to be done, so they go about it as best as they can guess. -
gra05 — 10 years ago(November 30, 2015 05:51 PM)
Calling me a pervert is very strange indeed. I am the one trying to say that children should be protected from this embarrassment. How would you like it if your parents put you nude in a movie when you were too young to know and then later in highschool you get made fun of? I think it makes more sense to call the people perverts who are trying to justify this. There was no purpose for showing her genitals during that scene no matter how real it needed to be. Tom Selleck's hand could have blocked the view or the baby's leg or they could just show it from far away or from certain angles. During the first half of the scene you can tell they were blocking her nudity in the manner I described above but then it is like the director stepped in half way and said "wait! We just HAVE to show the baby's privates". Very sick indeed.
-
gra05 — 10 years ago(December 01, 2015 10:51 PM)
It appears YOU need to get a life. Why are you following me on IMDB and justifying every instance of underrage female nudity being shown that I complain about? Your first response to me was under the movie "Pretty Baby" which tells me you are a fan of that movie as opposed to you following my trail of comments there. You never fully answer the underlying gist of my questions: is underrage female genital nudity okay to you but not for males? Even in this discussion you imply that male infant nudity isn't okay because it is more visible but then you go on to justify female genital nudity.dodging my accusations. You did the same under "Pretty Baby".
-
gra05 — 10 years ago(January 19, 2016 08:36 AM)
Your response makes sense. Explorer's response made no sense. It sounded to me like he was justifying underrage female nudity while trying to explain why male underrage nudity is worse. Unlike you , he wasn't consistent and kept dodging my questions. You acknowledge that both male and female infant nudity has been shown equally and that it is equally innocent. I will respect that argument because you are being consistent. The other guy wasn't so I don't understand why he is clapping for your response.
-
gra05 — 10 years ago(January 25, 2016 07:39 AM)
You are the one who enjoys following me around on here and who appears to have too much time on your hands. I am just on here stating my opinion. You don't have to read my posts if you don't want to. The fact that you got excited over the fact that another poster came on here and agreed with your point of view during a discussion about a diaper changing scene of a baby girl is very sad and peculiar to me. I will leave it at that. I don't mind people disagreeing with me like the other poster did, but the manner in which you yourself have been defending underage female nudity within the comments under two different movies now, one which is about a 12 year old prostitute, is quite disturbing to me. But I will stop there and give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming I am misunderstanding your intentions.
-
daughterofolaf — 9 years ago(July 31, 2016 12:42 PM)
these long perverted diaper changing scenes.
Your hangup on an infant's genitals being shown and referring to scenes with diapers being changed as "perverted" says far more about you and how your mind works than any infant nudity in this film does about anyone else. You sound like you have some severe issues since changing a diaper is viewed as something sexual to you. F v c k ing creepy.
"Your petty vengeance fetish will have to do withOUT Mr. Groin!" -
captain-bryce — 9 years ago(October 07, 2016 08:19 PM)
Why is it always a girl baby in these movies when there is a long perverted diaper changing scene?
You mean as opposed to scenes where an infant boy is completely naked (also in context with the story) like in Man of Steel?