Black Confederates ????????
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Glory
Karneda92 — 15 years ago(February 12, 2011 12:04 PM)
I heard there were African Americans that willingly fought for the Confederacy ? is this true ? if so does anyone know why they would do this? I also heard that they were employed By Nathan Bedfored Forrest the guy that started the KKK, now im officialy confused.
-
digitaldiva — 15 years ago(February 14, 2011 01:23 PM)
Hi Karneda92,
The Black Confederates is a recurrent thread on this board and on all Civil War boards. There is a self-published book by one of the Sons of the Confederacy called Black Confederates. I have it and have read it. By "willingly fought", did you mean, eat, drink, drill with white troops as comrade in arms? If so, no. Blacks were not allowed to be armed though the authors claim that around 20 or 30 blacks bore arms but couldn't give names or locations. If you meant cook, bury the dead, do laundry, drive mule teams, dig ditches and trenches, yes, blacks certainly worked for the Confederacy. There were also number of slaves who acted as valets followed their masters into war, either because they ordered to or willingly. There are a number of articles on the web questioning the Myth of the Black Confederates too. -
Judger — 14 years ago(August 25, 2011 11:37 AM)
Many people are suspicious and even dismissive of such claims.
The roles of blacks in service of the Confederacy have been controversial because assertions of willing service in the war have been made by white racists with dubious motives.
However, I think it is clear that black slaves did play some role in the Confederate defense. They definitively played some role as servants and in support roles.
Less clear is whether a significant number of black slaves actually served in the Confederate military and participated in combat. It has been argued that black slaves viewed the "Northern Aggression" into the South as an invasion of the homeland just like the white population.
People who dismiss the notion of Black Confederates are wrong. Late in the War the South authorized the creation of battalions manned by slaves. There is plenty of photographic evidence of uniformed and armed blacks in Confederate uniform. You can refer to this very good web site on the subject:
http://blackconfederatesoldiers.com/index.html
There are two larger questions that this raises:- Was the role of blacks in the Confederate armies significant?
I don't see any evidence that it was, other than in support positions such as cooks. - Does the presence of blacks in the Confederate armies add legitimacy to the Southern cause?
I don't see how.
Slavery was not the only issue that brought the nation to Civil War, but it was the great moral issue underlying the conflict. The south stood to perpetuate a truly heinous institution.
A close inspection of an historical period always identifies contradictions to stereotypes. Not all Slave holders were evil and not all master-slave relationships were the same, but they were all profoundly wrong.
I was born in the house my father built
- Was the role of blacks in the Confederate armies significant?
-
dannieboy20906 — 9 years ago(May 29, 2016 07:04 PM)
Keep in mind that once you say that A = B, you have also said that B = A.
In other words, without disagreeing with you and the essential evil of owning another person, some slave owners must have been more evil than others, and therefor some must have been less evil than others.
Good people sometimes perform evil acts and even the most evil people sometimes perform good acts. It is difficult for me to think of anything that Stalin or Hitler did that is good. Hitler seems to have loved his dog, but I think he poisoned her to test the cyanide pill he was about to give Eva.
Nevertheless, I cling to Yin and Yang. Even slave holders must have been less than pure evil.
The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank. -
activista — 10 years ago(February 05, 2016 11:59 PM)
@guyinwesthouston
And let's not forget there were Black slave owners and traders as well. Let the liberals play a race card on that one.
What the hell do you mean by "playing the race card"? Fck that stupid "race card" s***,there is no such fckn thing. Race is not a fckn game anyone playsit's always been a very REAL problem and always has been for people of color. And were a very small number of black slave owners, and the "slaves" they owned were actually their own family members whom they bought out of slavery so that they could stay together. White folks always like throwing that fact about black slave owners up as if it justifies your white ancestors having enslaved us in the first place, and as a way to deflect from those same ancestors having been slavemasters. Newsflashno it fckn dosen't justify a damn thing that was done to my ancestors, so fck off with that bull****.
Also, none of these Black Confederates were ever allowed to see battle,and they certainly were never near anywhere enough to claim that they supported the Civil War-the majority of slaves wanted to get the fck of the South and fight for the Union, not the Confederacy that wanted to keep them enslaved. So really, the whole "Black Confederates" thing is just some straws these Sons of the Confederacy have grasped to claim that there were black slaves on their sidesyeah, right,that's really stretching it. -
-
ballston54 — 14 years ago(April 27, 2011 03:16 PM)
And just how many of these guys were there compared to the tens of thousands who fought for the Union? The African-American troops fighting for the U.S. have monuments, such as that at Petersburg, outside Richmond, for the black Pennsylvania unit that launched the initial assault on the Confederate fortifications, and the famous one to the 54th Massachussetts in Washington, DC. I've seen them both and maybe others have too on this thread. Where are the monuments to any black confederates?
-
NoahBody — 14 years ago(October 05, 2011 11:13 AM)
And just how many of these guys were there compared to the tens of thousands who fought for the Union?
Where are the monuments to any black confederates?
This is a fallacy called Moving the goal post. Your side lost the original debate, so you attempt to change (move the goal) the debate.