Cursedchild13
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Friends
ppllkk — 9 years ago(November 22, 2016 07:25 PM)
Cursedchild13
wrote:
You are only a cheater if you're in a relationship and sleep with someone else.
It seems that Rachel agrees with your definition because she never accused Ross of "cheating" on her, using that term, with Chloe. She quotes her mother in using the word "cheater," but she never says it for herself.
So, we do need another term for screwing your best friend's fianc. -
Moonlighty — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 08:10 AM)
She's not a cheater. She was single when she slept with Barry. You are only a cheater if you're in a relationship and sleep with someone else.
Now she's still disgusting and awful for doing that, but she isn't a cheater.
Good point.Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that I'll be over here looking through your stuff.
-
omerkosar5 — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 08:54 AM)
Aahahaah feminist alert ! Sex is a 2 person thing.Being single doesnt mean she isnt cheater.She could have said to Barry " No i dont wanna do it.You are engaged to my best friend.Thats horrible".But she didnt that means she is horrible person.Period.
-
Moonlighty — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 09:07 AM)
I don't think you know what a feminist is when you act like it's a horrible thing, but you were already busy making a lot of stupid points, so I'm not entirely surprised you aren't so big on caring about what words mean.
Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that I'll be over here looking through your stuff.
-
omerkosar5 — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 09:15 AM)
Well,im not saying it is a horrible thing.I actually looked at her profile.She is so one sided and obsessive.What im saying to her is Rachel has the equal blame with Barry for doing that but she is only accusing the men for having sex with someone else.I am also accusing someone else (Rachel) okay ?
-
imaneassi — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 09:29 AM)
she's no cheater and she's not the one who is disrespecting her committement. She's not responsible for his committement.He is.Rachel could as well walk naked in front of Barry,it's up to him alone to give in or not.If he's actually committed,there is nothing, Rachel or any third person could do to make him cheat.
And for me only someone married is out of reach.Everyone else is fair game.Even engaged people.If they're committed, no temptation can change that. If they give into temptation, it means they're not committed.
AND IT WORKS FOR BOTH MEN AND WOMEN
I never blamed Chloe for making a move on Ross.I blame Ross for cheating. I wouldn't have blamed Mark for making a move on Rachel while she was with Ross.I would blame Rachel for giving into it.
I don't blame temptation for existing.I blame those who claim to be committed but don't resist temptation, those who cheat. You can't resist temptation? Don't commit.
And it works for both men and women -
omerkosar5 — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 09:44 AM)
I think you should blame Rachel for having sex with Barry.I get your point by the way.But i dont agree with you.Making a move maybe but having sex with engaged person definitely is a disgusting thing to do.
-
imaneassi — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 06:59 PM)
Again,if that someone is committed,he/she wouldn't cheat.The only thing I find disgusting is sleeping with a married person.Like I said for me everyone is fair game except married people. And my morals being different than yours don't make yours better.For me a person isn't someone's property just because they are in a relationship. People should know they have options before committing(getting married) and are entitled to change their mind till they say yes at the altar.Of course they shouldn't let things get to that point unless at that moment they discover something that changes everything drastically.
-
Cursedchild13 — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 08:26 PM)
So sleeping with ANYONE who is in a relationship is cool as long as they aren't married? If you sleep with a person who has a girlfriend and you have an affair for 6 months that's okay? That isn't bad?
You're retarded. Oh especially since Rachel wasn't "seeing about options" dumb ass. She was sleeping with a guy she knew was engaged. But that's okay with you. Because it's Rachel. -
-
imaneassi — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 08:39 PM)
No,they weren't broken up.Show me where Rachel breaks up with him and says that
she
dumps him,like Ross claims he thought. Or show me where he dumps her and tells her so. All we have is Rachel thinking that
maybe he
dumped her when he hung up on her refusing to listen to her and decided to fight for him.But no break up happed till she found out he cheated. -
imaneassi — 9 years ago(December 04, 2016 02:45 AM)
Rachel wasn't sure that they broke up.He just hung up on her refusing to listen to her,so she thought that maybe he dumped her and decided to fight for him. Fact is that no break up happened till she found out he cheated.Amazing,isn't it, how crystal clear she was,no confusion whatsoever when she dumps him, yet we're supposed to believe that she dumped him when she said she was glad he called and tried to hide and explain Mark's presence? Sorry but the writers screwed up destroying any credibility Ross's so called feelings for Rachel had and tried desperatly to save their unrootable romantic male lead and their toxic endgame couple.
-
imaneassi — 9 years ago(December 04, 2016 10:30 AM)
Learn to read unless you're ignoring the facts I brought up proving my point on purpose.
No break up happened before she found out. What she told Monica was "kinda broke up" proving that she didn't know if when he hung up on her, he dumped her but she decided to fight for his worthless ass till she found out he cheated, and only then the break up happened.