I'm going to stop discussing this now because it seems painfully obvious to me that even though it was the script, then
-
TheAdlerian — 9 years ago(June 25, 2016 07:51 AM)
This is craziness!
He has a horrible empty life and she has a horrible empty life due to her criminal parents. They find each other and have family type of love, not sexual.
Leon is willing to die for her like a father would for his daughter.
Leon also wants to save a plant!!
He's like the character Roy in Blade Runner who has seen lots of death, is dying, and comes to value life very much.
It's just because Portman is pretty that people think sex, but honestly after watching the film, how can you say that? -
bowilly-88704 — 9 years ago(June 25, 2016 12:44 PM)
Anyone that can't see a Love Interest between Leon and Mathilda, is totally missing the story altogether.A Love Interest is definitely there for all to see. The argument has always been and remains, was it Sexual, Paternal or Platonic? No matter what name you give it a Love Interest exists between them. The entire story evolves around this premise. I personally don't see it as Sexual, neither can I give it a name, and maybe that was Besson's intention when he wrote the script.
-
TheAdlerian — 9 years ago(June 25, 2016 04:34 PM)
It wouldn't be crazy for her to love him romantically, but not sexually as she is too little to know what that is and didn't appear to be in puberty yet. However, she grew up in a rejecting kind of family and some girls become hyper sexual because of that, but still I think she's too little.
Anyway, what I previously said about Leon is the main point as he's the main character. He clearly loves and values the plant, thus he's in love with life after having been caught up with death all the time. Same theme in Blade Runner. -
soupphysics — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 01:10 AM)
Nonsense. While he loves her as a daughter, she absolutely is in love with him.
This isn't perverted, and it isn't uncommon for an 11-year old girl, to have a crush on an adult, that will naturally never lead to anything more. It's not all that different from young kids/teens being in love with celebrities.
Make sure to watch the international version, which is 23 minutes longer than the theatrical version. I hear some of the scenes about the relationship were removed in the shorter version. -
soupphysics — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 01:05 AM)
There absolutely is a love interest between them. Not from his side, other than loving her as one would a daughter, but she directly tells that she's in love with him.
There is nothing perverted or pedophile about this. It's not even uncommon for a young girl to have a crush on an adult. It's not that different from them being in love with celebrity idols. It passes.
Maybe you only watched the theatrical version, where some of the scenes, that make this clear, were removed. Try watching the international version, which is 23 minutes longer. -
angryskorpion-44260 — 9 years ago(September 07, 2016 07:26 PM)
She was 12 years old (movie) and 13 in real life. They showed her pulling up her panties after getting out of bed with Leon. Physically, she is ready for sex. Women used to get married and have children at that age. Edgar A. Poe married his FIRST COUSIN Virginia Clemm when she was 12 years old for crying out loud!! And now, centuries later people wince and call you a pedo if you have sex with a female 2 days before her 18th birthday. Like 18 is some magical number that transforms a girl into a woman overnight.
-
tectactoe — 9 years ago(September 16, 2016 03:47 AM)
I completely agree with you. After reading all of the comments online, I was expecting a weirdo, creepy vibe from it. I hadn't seen either version of the movie, so I went straight for the "extended" cut.
Yes, Mathilda obviously has a crush on Lon. This is clear, and given the circumstances, not surprising. She's grown up without a real "man" in her life since her father was a drug addict who hit her. Lon was her savior, he was like Superman to her, it was the man in her life that she had always needed/wanted to just be there for her and protect her, so as a "coming of age" 12-year old heading into puberty, her obsession with Lon is understandable.
However I felt that it was made VERY clear several times that Lon has NO interest in her as a lover, and ONLY as a fatherly figure. He rejects her advances several times, very bluntly. I think sometimes there's a slightly awkward "tension" between the two because HE'S experiencing that same social awkwardness. He hasn't dealt with young children before, he's slightly slow (possibly) or at the very least, immature, and not exactly a social butterfly. So when Mathilda starts saying these things to him, he obviously doesn't know exactly how to handle them without completely being a jerk, so we can sense his awkward tension in these situations. Nevertheless, it is still made clear that he has no interest in her as a lover, but his feelings towards her are a fatherly-love. Don't people see how uncomfortable and stiff he was when she asked him to sleep in the same bed as her? He clearly wanted no part of it.
People who've gotten that vibe are either sheltered prudes or are just completely missing the point of the unique (and unconventional) dynamic of Lon and Mathilda's relationship. She has misplaced feelings for him, understandable, but they are definitely not reciprocated.