Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. One of the Worst Films of All Time?

One of the Worst Films of All Time?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
15 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    06986 — 14 years ago(August 01, 2011 03:03 PM)

    Definitely one of the worst and most racist.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        chas437 — 14 years ago(August 06, 2011 08:12 AM)

        Oh, I laughed throughout the film, but I don't think the film was meant to be funny. PCU was a satire about politcal correctness run amok. This film is every PC, bleeding heart's wet dream come to life. But yeah, you are right the whole thing about being a freshman college being like being like your first day in the prison yard is hilarious. The scene where Tyra Banks spits blood is hysterical.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          jac91604 — 14 years ago(October 03, 2011 01:55 AM)

          You need to look up the definition of satire.
          This is not a satire.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              soco-81 — 14 years ago(October 11, 2011 10:11 AM)

              That's some bizarre logic, dude. It's not a satire at all, and should be viewed as it was intended to be viewed, as a serious drama. The movie doesn't work today cause the subject matter no longer has as much impact. Just like some 80's movies or 70's movies. Doesn't negate the fact that, at one time, it was important.
              It's a sad thing that your adventures have ended here

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                jac91604 — 14 years ago(October 17, 2011 01:03 AM)

                That's correct the film is not satire at all. And you can't view it as such.
                The only thing I disagree with is that it didn't work in the 90s either.
                It was laughable back then.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  biggnidogg — 14 years ago(December 14, 2011 01:33 AM)

                  I just watched the movie why so serious??? its a movie!!!! you think this is bad.i was already being called names in primary school back in 1997 in London England.obviously what can you do.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    gabby_bm — 14 years ago(December 16, 2011 10:00 AM)

                    The problem was that it inadvertently came off as a laughable parody. This was not Singleton's intent when he made it, of course. Did it make people think or reconsider their actions or attitudes? By the response on these message boards, I would say not.
                    It's a far cry from his earlier work, "Boyz in the Hood" which was phenomenally written and directed. I think Singleton was trying to say too much in "Higher learning" and as a result, he used too broad of brushstrokes to paint the characters and events which lacked any depth or subtlety. When the "manipulation of thought" is presented obviously, most intelligent people recognize it as manipulation and reject it, even though they might still subscribe to that school of thought.
                    It's like those ads on TV for the ChildFund ("just 35-cents a day") or those ASPCA ads with "sad doggies" in cages. Tell me what you're thinking. But don't try to guilt and manipulate me into what you're thinking. It's offensive to think I am that easy to control.
                    "Atlas Shrugged- Part 1"

                    • NOW on DVD!
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      brendanrau — 14 years ago(October 31, 2011 09:29 PM)

                      The characterization of all the
                      dramatis personae
                      had the depth of a brochure on date rape. Yet a "Take Back the Night" rally was more entertaining than "Higher Learning" because the script made
                      Valley of the Dolls
                      read like
                      Anna Karenina
                      , and the plot was premised on straw man after straw manthe most egregious of which was Remy.
                      Per aspera ad astradum spiro, spero! Ivi vi via.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        howardgrantrulz — 14 years ago(November 21, 2011 07:13 PM)

                        I saw this film back in 1995 and thought it was good. I saw it in 1999 and thought it was silly. I saw it 2 years ago and thought it was downright hysterical.
                        First, if a white director had made this, he would be called a racist and would probably be blacklisted and never allowed to make a studio film again.
                        Second, this film is preachy in a hammer to the head kind of way.
                        Third, are there any good white people??
                        Fourth, every cop is racist.
                        Fifth, every African American is in the right, every white person - in the wrong.
                        Sixth, I get what Singleton is trying to say and that the college campus is meant as an allegory where it represents the US as a whole. The problem is - its hammy and over the top.
                        Singleton had 2 good movies (Boyz and Poetic) then he made thiswhich is awful. Rosewood is good. But since then, he has made studio crap - with the exception of Baby Boy - he has nothing to say and is a director 4 hire.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          Musicfan1223 — 14 years ago(December 11, 2011 04:38 AM)

                          Kristen the one who almost got raped, was a good person. It was the White males portrayed as bad.
                          men lie, women lie, but numbers don't. Jay-Z

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            gabby_bm — 14 years ago(December 16, 2011 10:03 AM)

                            I wouldn't say "good person". She was painted as naive, vulnerable and racist.
                            "Atlas Shrugged- Part 1"

                            • NOW on DVD!
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              prplayer — 9 years ago(July 13, 2016 11:21 AM)

                              it's up there
                              so many movies, so little time

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups