Just when conservatives can't be any more foolish.they completely outdo themselves once again.
-
Dagwoodie — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 12:06 PM)
Maybe Mr. Bradley should review the First Amendment?
Maybe you should post the whole story, instead of cherry-picking those parts of it that Lasner nothing but a victim.
Lasner joyously tweeted that his "husband" was at the airport, and rushing to get the opportunity to harass Trump's daughter and grandchildren.
Of course, he has since courageously deleted that tweet, and probably even his entire account. My, what brave souls you SJW's are!
Also:
Lasner posted a photo of a college student wearing an old Reagan / Bush shirt earlier this year without the young man's knowledge and then wrote:
'Seeing this walking out of @packercollegiate this morning made seriously ill. It's disgusting that teenagers might find this amusing. As far as I'm concerned it's hate speech. #idontheartthe80s'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4059082/Ivanka-Trump-aggressively-confronted-man-JetBlue-sitting-children-screams-father-ruining-country-asks-flight.html#ixzz4ULw5wXIo
Finally - he has every right to spout off and show what a spoiled little fool he is. But if an employer or institution should determine that his speech and conduct, however constitutionally protected, has become harmful or an embarrassment to it by association, then it has every right to sever that relationship. Just as the University of Missouri eventually did, although not nearly soon enough to save its own ass, when it kicked reprehensible Melissa Click to the curb. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 06:44 PM)
So once again, he needs to be fired for joyously exercising his First Right Amendment on Twitter. As far as the plane, he was an observant - he did not engage with his husband's communication with Ivanka.
Again, if it was any other passenger he would not have been 'deplaned' with his family, and if he was a 'security risk' they would not have let him on the next plane.
And by judging the photo the Daily Mail published (which is the only photo that seems to have surfaced), you will see that the passengers directly in front of Ivanka are rather non-plussed (one man is talking on his phone). No one has turned to look and see what was going on behind them, which is a natural reaction if there was an 'aggressive confrontation' or 'screaming' going on right above their heads. The photo certainly does not match up to the description of the scenario.
Makes me question the validity of that statement, and believe the surrounding passengers who said he spoke in an audible conversational voice - doing nothing wrong but taking advantage of his free speech rights.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 07:17 AM)
This individual verbally attacks a young woman and her children in a confined space where she could NOT leave , and then he deletes his Twitter feed and his entire Twitter account . That's a clear indication that he knows he screwed up.
No, that's a clear indication he's being harassed and bullied by the Trump worshippers, just like he's being bullied on Amazon. Trump supporters do not believe in freedom of speech when it comes to telling the truth, which is why Trump is trying to weaken the First Amendment for journalists and reporters.
Now his book on Amazon has a one star rating , he's at risk of losing his career, and 95% of the country sees him as a coward who attacks young women and children. It looks like he did an amazing job at destroying his life. Perhaps he can go cry on his husband's shoulder.
His book dropped to a one star rating overnight on December 23 (I already reported that in another thread) and of over the 100+ 'reviewers' only one reviewer (who gave it 4 stars) was a 'verified buyer'. The others didn't even mention the book - only his husband.
His career is in no danger at all.
95% of Trump worshippers - not the country - sees him as a coward for no reason at all.They are trying to destroy his life for exercising the First Amendment.
Get your facts straight, before you post.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 09:04 AM)
Bombarding his Amazon page with bad reviews is a fascist tactic. The people who did so didn't read his book. Everyone knows that. We're seeing fascism at work in America.
Jeff Sessions is withholding DECADES of records that outline his blatant racism in the portfolio he's submitted for confirmation. DECADES of racism swept under the rug. That's also FASCISM. -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 12:00 PM)
Definition of Fascism=whenever Hester can't come up with a coherent argument to defend her "position", which is generally 99% of the time! What a gigantic
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 01:11 PM)
Bombarding his Amazon page with bad reviews is a fascist tactic. The people who did so didn't read his book. Everyone knows that. We're seeing fascism at work in America.
Republicans are in deep denial over this. All they know is 'Trump won!'. That's it.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 02:12 PM)
It's funny you libs never have a problem with getting someone fired from the right for free speech.
I'm sure you can give us an excellent example of this, correct? We'll wait.
And don't mix up free speech with 'erroneous speech'/ 'lies'.
Whoops! There goes your example!
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
bishop-69757 — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 05:39 PM)
What's the point? You will never criticize liberals on anything. If you want to leave your safe space, feel free to look into it and you will find plenty of examples of the left trying to get people fired just for having a different opinion especially on these crazy liberal college campuses.
-
zabbree — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 05:48 PM)
There is a huge difference between trying to get someone removed from a position when they espouse an ideology that is contradictory to what their position means and trying to have a man fired because someone else did something you feel is wrong.
-
JamesAvalon — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 08:18 PM)
Do you think it is ok to fire someone for believing in traditional marriage? If so, then we should have fired Obama.
I already know you think it is ok to force someone to do something against their religious beliefs. But only if you are a Christian. Not a Muslim. In fact, if anyone dares even burn the Quran, you liberals go feverishly insane.
People are scared to say what they believe publicly in fear of facing liberal reprisal.
You liberals are hateful and violent and intolerant and you have no morals. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 07:49 PM)
What's the point? You will never criticize liberals on anything. If you want to leave your safe space, feel free to look into it and you will find plenty of examples of the left trying to get people fired just for having a different opinion especially on these crazy liberal college campuses.
In other words, there are no examples. Just more opinions you pulled out of your @ss, hoping we'd believe you. No surprises there - that's what Republicans like to do best.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16