Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Should have been called 'Shaft's Nephew'

Should have been called 'Shaft's Nephew'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
6 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Shaft


    edwardholub — 13 years ago(September 04, 2012 03:14 PM)

    Because Richard Roundtree is IN the movie and he plays Shaft! Jackson is Shaft's newphew. Couldn't they get that right, at least?
    There is no "off" position on the genius switch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Skye_Reynolds — 12 years ago(July 14, 2013 03:45 PM)

      Perhaps they could have gone the Rocky Balboa route and called it John Shaft. It does seem kind of odd that it would simply be called Shaft since it's actually the fourth film in the series as opposed to a remake.
      "In literature, it's called plagiarism. In the movies, it's homage." ~ Roger Ebert

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Manna-Fest — 9 years ago(July 19, 2016 12:39 PM)

          Friday the 13th (2009) and Evil Dead (2013) aren't continuations of the original continuity of the films before them though. So it makes sense for them to have the same titles as the original films. They're starting from scratch.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Manna-Fest — 9 years ago(July 20, 2016 09:55 AM)

              Friday the 13th (2009) wasn't a real remake but that's not the point. It was not tied to the same continuity as the films before it so it having just "Friday the 13th" in it's title made sense. Shaft (2000) is a bigger deal since it wasn't starting a new continuity.
              So Evil Dead (2013) DOES connect to the previous films in the franchise? Well then it should have had a subtitle so people didn't think of it as a remake or reboot with a whole new continuity.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups