I wonder if this film wasn't based on an L. Ron Hubbard book…
-
Authoring — 10 years ago(July 19, 2015 10:00 PM)
Warning: If you care enough, you should copy and paste this somewhere before this guy:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur2976184/
inevitably gets it deleted.
LMAO! Josh, out of what I can only imagine was utter embarrassment (and rightfully earned embarrasment at that), has finally stopped trying to get the last word (in this thread:
http://www.imdb.com/board/11454029/board/nest/220116505?p=1
using his various other accounts to delete posts that pointed out how he was wrong, and just went and deleted all of his and my posts and everyone else's posts, and changed his username from JoshuaHutchins to
BertramWilberforceWooster
! LMAO! Wow, this is hilariously amazing. I've never felt so vindicated over something that occured online. Whatever he changes his name to, here's a link to his main profile:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur2976184/
Below is the argument between he and I in full with his old posts in the quote boxes and my old responses outside of those boxes and underneath his posts.
Summary of what this post is all about
: This is basically an argument wherein BertramWilberforceWooster/JoshuaHutchins claims to like a movie but not its book form. Then, when asked why he disliked the book, he confidnetly and rudely lists negatives that happened in the movie, not the book! When this is pointed out to him he basically mentally sharts himself a bunch then finally screams in all red capitol letters something that translated too, "I WAS TOO DUMB TO UNDERSTAND THIS VERY SIMPLE BOOK FOR TEENS AND YOUNG ADULTS THAT MY CLASS WAS FORCED TO READ IN HIGH SCHOOL ONCE BUT THAT I DIDN'T READ PAST PAGE 10 OF PERSONALLY PARTLY BECAUSE IT HURT MY HEAD BUT ALSO BECAUSE THE MAIN DUDE CRIED OVER HIS FRIEND WHO COMMITTED SUICIDE IN THE PART I READ AND THAT MADE MY INSECURE MALE EGO FEEL GAY OR SOMETHING SO I BURNED THE BOOK IN MY BATHTUB AND JUST KNOW ABOUT IT FROM CLASS DISCUSSIONS AND SEEING THE MOVIE 12 YEARS LATER BUT SINCE I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT HAPPENEID IN IT, I'M CONFUSING WHAT HAPPENED IN IT WITH WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MOVIE AND YOU POINTING THAT OUT IS EMBARRASSING ME WHILE I TRY TO PRETEND TO BE AN AVID READER IN FRONT OF THE BIG IMDB KIDS! GO AWAY!" After my on-the-nose reply to that tantrum he enlists the help of himself via his other accounts and goes on to first reply to me about how his JoshuaHutchins account/character was right and I was wrong without elaborating or anything. Then when I responded to those messages from his other accounts pointing out obvious facts that embarrased him even more, he went on a quest to use his multiple accounts to delete my posts in that thread as well as in other threads unrelated to that one.
I was only able to copy and paste his old posts because my old laptop broke while I had the tab with our original posts still open and upon recently getting it fixed, found it was basically a time capsule for my old internet activity. So below is our argument from before doughy pathetic Josh/Bertram, in utter shame, went delete-crazy. You epitomize unintelligent loser, Bertram/Josh. Unintelligent people go to great lengths to conceal their stupidity from the world, so you doing this makes total sense. Funny how if you didn't actually hate Perks because you never actually read or understood it before, I bet you
actually
hate it now because it must now always remind you of this shameful event where you were revealed to be an unintelligent simpleton and got so embarrased by that being made public that you deleted all of yours and your opponent's posts. How traumatizing for you. Lol, ya big dumb baby.
For the
tl;dr
crowd,
BertramWilberforceWoster
will delete your comments with his other accounts, as he did to mine, if you cotradict him with facts because he is incredibly unintelligent and very insecure about that fact. Below is our argument before he deleted everything:
by
JoshuaHutchins Fri Dec 20 2014 05:27:39 Flag
Ignore User Report Post | Reply | Permalink
IMDb member since January 2004
"]
by
RandomUser Thurs Dec 19 2014 02:27:39 Flag
Ignore User Report Post | Reply | Permalink
IMDb member since January 2004
"You did not just posted (sic) the Perks of Being a Wallflower. You did not just do that. OMG. NO! The Perks of Being a Wallflower is one of the most amazing books ever! The film adaptation does not give justice to the beauty and the flawlessness of the narration in the printed material."
No, I did not just posted that. I wrote it four months ago. Charlie spent the first 3/4 of the book crying every other page, then he spends an 1/8 of the book talking about how he wouldn't cry. Around that mark, we finally get to why he tears up about everything.
Charlie was a pussy? Yeah, you're a moron. You don't seem to have a legitimate reason for disliking the book.
by
JoshuaHutchins Sat Dec 21 2014 07:47:39 Flag
Ignore User Report Post | Reply | Permalink
IMDb member since January 2004
This book was marketed toward my generation, was heavily advertised on MTV, I checked it out. It was horrible. The movie -
wallacesawyer — 10 years ago(August 15, 2015 02:17 PM)
I like to think this film is bad on its own merits. I know little of Scientology other than that SOUTH PARK episode. I don't know much of L. Ron Hubbard or most of his writings.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/