Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Did anyone else find the ending to be the least bit offensive?

Did anyone else find the ending to be the least bit offensive?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
44 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    MissPiggy13 — 19 years ago(June 06, 2006 04:02 PM)

    It isn't run by us anymore cause we been run over,out of our lands, put on reservations, assimilated, pushed out of our culture,taken over by others, and have to watch it all destruct (our land, languages, culture,etc.) - very hard to 'get over it' as you say. You might not feel connected to your ancestores cause you don't actually live in the UK or Germany. Apparently you haven't a clue as to respect. And btw, i care if you do or don't respond to me.
    Nobody notices the sober Indians. On tv the drunk Indians emote In books drunk Indians philosophize

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #21

      lameduck-2 — 19 years ago(June 11, 2006 09:14 PM)

      "By the way, don't respond to me, because you know what, i really don't care."
      Hypocrite.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #22

        lilt_native — 19 years ago(December 05, 2006 06:49 PM)

        Pshh deyy tellin uss to ruhspect I don't tink they know thaa first thing to respect
        and besides YEAH you might not feel connected,
        but hey
        WE DO.
        so derr
        how come durs so much fightin goin on

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #23

          mekaatnu — 17 years ago(July 29, 2008 10:11 PM)

          Blast that monument! That monument was a middle finger to Native Americans. These folks defaced a hill Native Americans found sacred to show who was in charge. Why the hell should some Native Americans or progressive non-natives give a good damn about offending the sensibilities of Americans who extol that monument. Native Americans were the first ones here-they do not have to necessarily respect what outsiders hold sacred when it DESIGNED offends them. If anything, everybody who is not Native and don't like this can go back to where they came from because no matter how long you stay in a country-if you are not indigenous-especially if you are a settler or benefit from the act- then you are a freaking guest!As for holding on to the past, folks wronged have as much a right to hold on to the past-if they so choose- as long as the oppressor treats them the more oppressed- as second-class. One more thing, natives have often been portrayed as so-called violent savages as much as they have been portrayed as noble savages so this goes both ways; and, pacifist or not, which is besides the point- Native Americans did not conquer the European homeland. The Europeans conquered the homelands of Native Americans!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #24

            mekaatnu — 17 years ago(July 29, 2008 10:14 PM)

            correction: When it is designed to offend them.
            Also, I meant to say progressive non-Natives for that matter!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #25

              cmcurrie2 — 14 years ago(July 24, 2011 11:42 PM)

              Whoa . . . I grew up with people like you. So clueless about the ways you offend others as a group. The Rushmore 'monument' is to celebrate the eviction of our native people from their land. Nothing more. I would love to see the faces converted to Sitting Bull, several other leaders, and at least one Native woman. You need to realize that the Native Americans have not ever been allowed to achieve justice. No one has done similar harm to your group: count your blessings, and ask some respectful questions or try to help.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #26

                deutschlandchick — 19 years ago(May 27, 2006 09:30 AM)

                I loved the movie, and the massage of the movie was right on. I jumped up and screamed "yea!" when the red paint came down!!!!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #27

                  Old55 — 19 years ago(June 20, 2006 09:52 PM)

                  Loved the ending!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #28

                    Vspeeds — 19 years ago(October 07, 2006 09:00 AM)

                    I find it offensive to choose to see the attempted genocide of an entire race in this country as some little mistaken blurb in a history class and instead see it as "helping" or something like that. I think it's offensive to sign a treaty promising the Black Hills (a sacred place) to the ndns there and then completely break it and carve into it the faces of people who may have helped along this discrimination. To carve up and blast away in those Hills is the equivalent of burning a church.
                    Yeah, we all know the old stories of the evil white-man, but give me a break.
                    It's that type of indifference and ignorance that helped facilitate so many atrocities. No, you are not responsible, but as long as your type of attitude prevails, they are NOT just "old stories". And what I mean by that is that your type of attitude minimizes all that has happened and looks at it as no big deal. Literally millions and millions were killed here through the advantage of firepower, killing the the vulnerable, very old and very young, diseases brought over from the filthy conditions the Europeans were immune to (fyi, they were immune because they were conditioned to literally live in sh*!ty and poor conditions (and not all transmitted diseases were through sex; there are very early examples of the first uses of germ warfare in the form of "gifts" like blankets given to the native that were from the smallpox infirmary of the nearby Army. And while we are at it, even if it was sexually transmitted, rape was very, very common). So who were really the "savages"????
                    The OP's entire original post is what is most offensive to me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #29

                      ReinaMissy — 19 years ago(December 01, 2006 01:51 PM)

                      Well put, indiegurl. I was as offended as you are by the original post in this thread; the depth of its indifference to the near cultural genocide perpetrated on this people is astounding.
                      I found the ending of "Skins" to be not only touching, but very metaphorical: the red tear trailing down Washington's cheek for all the crap that's occurred in the past 150 years.
                      FWIW, I'm White but I'm not a bleeding heart liberal. I don't need to be a liberal to acknowledge the reality of what one race did to another on this land. Anyone who tries to deny it is, quite frankly, an imbecile.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #30

                        canadamelody — 19 years ago(March 02, 2007 03:19 PM)

                        You are an idiot.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #31

                          arrowtop_1999 — 18 years ago(April 26, 2007 05:14 PM)

                          Why's that?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #32

                            ReinaMissy — 18 years ago(August 30, 2007 11:00 AM)

                            Well, arrowtop, I guess it's easier to call someone an idiot than to admit the truth.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #33

                              fastjeff — 18 years ago(May 10, 2007 09:20 AM)

                              "Did anyone else find the ending to be the least bit offensive?"
                              No.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #34

                                rizzoky — 18 years ago(November 20, 2007 10:33 AM)

                                To answer the original question, no, I didn't find the ending offensive. However, I found the movie to be boring and poorly written. The brothers weren't very likeable and the dialogue was laughable. What about the flashback from the football game? Cut to night time and the brothers are still wearing their shoulder pads hours later? Haha. I was laughing out loud. The only offense this movie committed was weakness.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #35

                                  TheRealBambi — 17 years ago(August 03, 2008 12:20 PM)

                                  What I find offensive that the faces of white boys are carved onto the rocks of Mother Earth.
                                  It's the worst kind of graffitti.
                                  Bambi
                                  <")
                                  ( ~/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #36

                                    fullerc-2 — 17 years ago(August 03, 2008 06:53 PM)

                                    I just saw this movie for the first time today. Given the context and historical background of the movie, I didn't found it offensive at all. Matter of fact, I'd probably do the same thing!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #37

                                      MysteryReaderReturns — 17 years ago(September 12, 2008 06:01 PM)

                                      It wasn't offensive to me, although I'm White & I like George Washington. I'm able to see the Indians' side in it, especially since the Black Hills have such significance. I'm glad it was in the film, because people who go there to see the monument rarely think about what it really symbolizes to the Indians shut off from their sacred land. Besides, I bet George Washington would think it was ridiculous he was on a mountain anywaymaybe he'd have a laugh with the Sioux about it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #38

                                        rivieran — 16 years ago(October 07, 2009 12:26 PM)

                                        Vandalism ain't cool (although I realize that some view the sculpture itself as vandalism), but I found the idea of George Washington crying a tear of blood metaphorically intriguing.
                                        Just not acceptable as far as the defacement aspect goes.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #39

                                          TheRealBambi — 16 years ago(October 15, 2009 01:24 PM)

                                          No, the defacement of those rocks being carved to represent the land stealers ain't cool.
                                          More red paint would have been nice .. cover the whole mess.
                                          <")
                                          ( ~/

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups