DAMN she looked old. All those wrinkles. Cher looks 100x better then her. Plus she can't act a bit.
-
thewolfheart — 21 years ago(September 03, 2004 02:42 AM)
Well I am not going to say that Madonna is a great actress, she is actually a weak actress, and her best performance ever was Evita. As for Swept Away, it does not add to Guy Ritchies career at all. The movie is not that bad, its weak but not the way I thought it was going to be from all the reviews and heat from the critics.
As far as Madonna her self, she is one hell of a woman who is very beautiful and still is mega sexy, she has an excellent body for her age (she is 46, come on . . . who is 46 and looks like her ?) and is still is in good shape and still performs skillfully. I love her character and well always watch her movies !
"favor gonna kill you faster than a bullet." -
r_jayy_dylan — 18 years ago(October 02, 2007 04:38 PM)
Original message:
Jendar you're wrong.
Madonna is a p1ss poor actress. Quite why people love her is beyond me.
To quote Kenny
"Madonna is an old anorexic whore who wore out her welcome years ago, and that now she suddenly speaks with a British accent and she thinks she can play guitar and she should go beep herself."
CARTMAN FOR PRESIDENT
Madonna is one of the most successful women in show business. If she's old it's because she is. If she looks like it, good for her. She atleast looks her age. She's not trying to impress people. She is 49 for god's sake. Her acting isn't Oscar worthy and plus she's better than all of Hollywood's bimbos put together. -
russpen — 21 years ago(November 22, 2004 03:56 AM)
I was also surprised that she looked so old! Take away the make-up and you'll see that she's really aging. But I'm not criticizing her or anything. She does have a great body and she's still an attractive woman. I was just surprised, that's all, 'coz I always thought she didn't have wrinkles and looked at least 10 years younger than she really was. But of course I still admire her! She's a living legend.
-
maritsa120 — 21 years ago(January 13, 2005 08:48 AM)
I remember reading somewhere that she was angry with Guy Richie because he made her look haggardly in the film. She looks her age and I think she looks fantastic for her age. We are living in an age where people are constantly getting plastic surgery to stay young forever. At this rate there won't be any cute little old ladies when I get old, just a bunch of stretched out old hoochie mama's. I don't think Madonna looked that bad in the movie. Like i said. She looked her age.
You'll have nothing and like it!
Double Farts!!! -
HeatherMac320 — 21 years ago(January 25, 2005 05:36 AM)
I remember reading somewhere that she was angry with Guy Richie because he made her look haggardly in the film.
Lmao!! Maybe he was hoping it would stop her from pestering him for a movie role ever again!
Nice move Guy!
-
challengerduluc — 19 years ago(April 29, 2006 12:50 PM)
She was what, 42 when she did this movie ? , Im only a few years off that and I hope I dont look that rough at that age. Shes probably under her natural weight which is why her face looks so haggard. she should stick to plastering on the make up.
I admire her determination and ability to make an incredible career out of virtualy zero artistic talent or ability - although she seems a bit of a cow. The only other person I can think of who's made such a lucrative career out of so little was Liz Hurley another tough old bint. -
JenVentu — 18 years ago(September 28, 2007 07:37 AM)
Well she was 43 or 44 in the movie, not the 20 or 30 something we remembered growing up. I do think the lighting (She had the sun glarring on her throughout this movie) wasn't complimentary. But what I find strange is she doesn't look any older today (5 years later). I'm assuming she finally discovered botax or perhaps had plastic surgery. Anyways, she is still beautiful although sometimes I miss the old Madonna. But we can't all be young forever.
