Nomination for Worst Movie of 2003?
-
movieseer2002 — 22 years ago(February 10, 2004 08:39 PM)
I forgot who posted this but lets get something straight. Just because a movie doesnt have a lot of explosions doesnt make it thought-provoking. This movie wanted to be thought-provoking but fell on its faith with its horrid script.
There are so many things wrong with this film:- Heath Ledger's one-note performance.
- The odd, uninvolving, and uunderdeveloped relationship with Sassomon.
- Jumbled plot
- Incredibly silly special effects ( peoples souls are extoplasmic calamari)
- So many things that made you laugh
-towards the end Ledger and his friend are being chased so Ledger leaves ona step hurt and runs away. Wow your a good friend Ledger.
- How did Sassomon get on an airplane? Didnt she escape from a loony bin? Besides why would he want this extremely annoying woman with her.
- So this weird cult is hanging people and this one guy gives Ledger crucial information as hes been hung!!!!! What the beep??!! There was never a clear connection between t he Sin Eater and the weird cult.
Horrid film that never should have been made.
-
akketangka — 22 years ago(February 11, 2004 06:16 AM)
maybe you should rewatch the movie again cause so many of your questions above DO have answers!!.
The movie is good on the basic idea, story plot, screenplay, and cinematography. indeed it is not a perfect movie, but which one is? just because it has some weak points or flaws, doesnt mean it is not worth watching. -
movieseer2002 — 22 years ago(February 11, 2004 06:44 PM)
It still wouldn't matter if some of my questions werent answered. I did watch it again and it still didnt make much sense.
Also it didnt erase the jumbled nature of the plot and the horribly underdevloped characters. What a weird and dopey romance. Also Heath ledger was seriously miscast. These character need to get a clue. Even in incoherence I was many steps ahead of the characters themselves. Finally the incredibly dumb special effects wont get fixed on another viewing.
I call all of these good reasons for calling it one of thr wrost of the year or that Ive seen. -
alisjones — 14 years ago(September 05, 2011 03:11 PM)
If you want to see a good presentation of 'sin-eating', watch this.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/58780/night-gallery-you-cant-get-help-like-that-anymoresins-of-the-fathers
I 'get' this movie without having to strain my brain. If it makes YOU think, that's good. It's ok, nothing special. -
zephyr-123 — 14 years ago(September 14, 2011 06:32 AM)
^^^I saw that ep of The Night Gallery about six months ago. My brother has some Night Gallery dvds. While watching The Order, I kept thinking about it. You're right. It is a better presentation of the sin-eater theme.
GG's-Sophia: ". . .my dear husband Sal, may he rest in peace until
I
get there. . ." -
!!!deleted!!! (30831097) — 13 years ago(May 20, 2012 05:08 PM)
I saw this movie for the first time the other day. It wasn't that bad. Granted, it's definitely not Heath's best movie, but I've seen much worse (i.e. "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigalow" is one of the WORST movies ever made, in my opinion. I actually contemplated leaving the theater early). "The Order" was more than tolerable. There's no bad acting in it, but some of the special effects seem a little silly. I give it 6/10 stars.
"If you can't fix it, you gotta stand it."
Ennis Del Mar