Worst Movie in the History of Cinema
-
scott-the-dot — 17 years ago(October 13, 2008 01:51 PM)
Pheeeew! What a stinker!
Ouch! That hurt.
This film is way worse than Superman 4 and Batman and Robin put toghether.
It's so completely one-dimensional. The first one was at least vaguely watchable but this one was really painful.
The motocross bit looked like something out of Power Rangers.
Ouch! -
Gamer21t — 18 years ago(January 04, 2008 03:58 PM)
Wasn't the worst but does indeed suck something awful. I can appreciate it when a movie isn't to be taken seriously but this just goes way too far. The action isn't enjoyable and looks ridiculously and the jokes simply blew. Bill Murray, who was about the only decent thing in the first movie, is gone and that just makes this one all the worse. A lot of people just like the three hot girls but I don't sit through 90 minutes of beep to see hot girls and who cares if they're hot or not? A million hot girls couldn't save this movie. The only thing I liked in this movie THE ONLY THING, was when Bernie Mac talked about the "Black Irish." The ending car wash scene and the Pussycat Dolls scene may have been aesthetically pleasing but so was Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within and that was one of the biggest pieces of cow dung ever. Good Night and enjoy the breeze.
-
stachogan — 18 years ago(February 14, 2008 10:37 AM)
This film was god awful.. it truly was..truly unbelievable.. thus I hate it..
I get it's a filmbut it's a film set in a reality similar to ours not one where a person can fly, not survive a huuge car crash.. or where someone can survive being thrown through a massive glass window..
Stupid stupid movie..
And why can the Irish man jump like.. 20 feet and not die, and why can he WALK THROUGH FIRE..
This film angers me..
Come and get it, bitches. -
safaribacardi — 17 years ago(August 13, 2008 04:26 PM)
The Worst Movie in the History of Cinema? Hyperbole, yes, BUT - this has to be in the discussion. I didn't mind the 1st flick. I checked my brain at the door, and whatever, it was dumb and campy, but enough fun that I didn't ask for my money back.
Full Throttle, however, should replace waterboarding as the most effective interrogation technique the Department of Defense has. I wanted to sit back and enjoy a mindless romp like the first, but I just wasn't strong enough. It's a real turd. This movie is complete OVERKILL. No, I wasn't expectin' Citizen Kane, let's get that straight. I expected something like the first.. what I got was Charlie's Angels 1 on acid. Dumb is acceptable for these types of movies, but WE HAVE TO DRAW A LINE SOMEWHERE. Over-the-top is one thing, but there was no conflict, nothing interesting, barely any laughs, and not a damn thing could I tip my cap to besides the fact that the financier had deep pockets. I can forgive this trash because it knows it's campy, the 1st got by on that, but I can't forgive this trash because it doesn't seem to care it sucks. -
Monknificent — 17 years ago(October 14, 2008 11:41 AM)
Yep, pretty well put there
The only smart thing about this movie was its poster, and the only people who had fun in relation to this film were the three female protagonists.
The rest of us (well, those with IQs in treble digits, at least) were in turn: blinded and deafened by what was coming off the screen and from the speakers, then annoyed, then angry, then saddened, then depressed, then angry again. Then we wanted to strangle McG. Then we got tired and slept. Then we tried to forget all about this, for the sake of our blood pressure.
Sigh -
liutenantsalt — 17 years ago(January 25, 2009 10:33 AM)
This movie is complete fun. It's not some movie which requires you to use your brains - you can just sit back, munch on the popcorn or whatever, relax and enjoy. No brains needed. <<
So, in other words, it's complete crap.
A good way to judge how terrible a movie is based on how much the idiot "I only go to movies to be entertained by mindless crap and shiny effects and boobies" crowd defends it.