Judd Nudity
-
mRoQuE — 11 years ago(March 30, 2015 11:09 AM)
Maybe you saw US tv version where it was cut out. Take a look here [ADULTS ONLY]:
http://www.badjojo.com/1187436/ashley-judd-double-jeopardy-topless/ -
whatever_lola_wants — 21 years ago(April 19, 2004 10:15 PM)
I think it's a little weird that some people think nudity is the most offensive thing that can be seen in a movie. I would say the violence would be the first turn-off as far as letting kids see something. I'd rather my kids see a breast than someone getting their face smashed in.
-
BoyleWelshFan — 21 years ago(May 12, 2004 07:21 AM)
HANG ON- If this person who started this topic IS genuine in that her Mum (Mom to all you yanks) is taking her little neice to see it i just have 2 things to say that really don't make sense
- WHY is she taking a TEN YEAR OLD to see a movie about a serial killer (especially a ten year old that ISN'T her own daughter/responsibility)
- WHY did the perverted twirp call this post "Judd Nudity" when any of the other actors in the film could be nude, not just Ashley Judd and make the post titled, oh i dunno, Need help, or rating advice or summin
sorry dude, you just sound like another pervert looking for nudity in a film, your story doesn't map out.
One cannot be betrayed if one has no people.
-
kelani — 21 years ago(May 13, 2004 08:57 AM)
You are a moron. The guy asked a simple question with a simple title, and anyone with half a brain knows if you want gratuitous nudity there's far better ways to get it.
Second, the reason he said Judd Nudity is likely because she's a main character and it is FAR more likely to have revealing female star nudity in a movie than, say, random male nudity. If you are jumping someone's case who obviously casually typed a simple title and question, then are looking for some kind of hidden perverted agenda behind it, you have way too much free time to waste. Of course his "story" doesn't map out. There is no story. Here in the US, Adults take their nieces and nephews and cousins to do things all the time. Responsibility for the child is a non-issue. Plus, did you ever stop to consider that maybe his Mom (Mum, sorry) has custody of the child, or is staying with her? There's many possibilities, any of which are none of your damn business.
And lastly, what irked me about your post was, even if this guy was only looking for nudity in a film, there's nothing perverted about that at all. Judging someone as a pervert in such a horrendously childish misuse of the word makes YOU seem like an anal, disgruntled reject from the Moral Majority or a 12 yr. old holier-than-thou brat. More than likely, you're just a wanker trying to troll a public forum for attention.
Nudity is natural, and if someoen wants to see it in a movie, more power to them. If it wasn't for your mom and dad being nude once, you wouldn't be here.
If the poster is a pervert for wanting to see nudity, then I guess about 80% of authors on the IMDB are perverts too.
No. Perverted would be wanting to see film of a naked woman doing kinky stuff with a potbellied pig - not wanting to see a plain old human body in a movie.
Have a nice day.
Kelani
http://lobd.org
The Land of Broken Dreams
The Net's Original Homepage
49 Million visitors since 1992 -
ddarke1963 — 21 years ago(September 05, 2004 10:35 PM)
Amen, it's about time someone finally said it. I hate the use of certain words to describe something when the definition gets lost. I'm a man, I like to see
naked women. Call me crazy, but it excites me. I know these Jerry Fallwell followers would like us to have sex with our clothes on, (if we ever have sex at all) but that's just not natural now is it. I saw this movie, I thought it was stupid, and if Ashley Judd had been nude in this movie, it could have only helped. I don't like the word pervert, especially now that's it used for almost anything sexual. We've been conditioned by the media, and the narrow minded moral majority to believe this load of crap. I think all these people need to look in the mirror drop the towel, touch themselves, and accept that they are "Perverts" just like the rest of us!!
P. S. I was lost for most of the movie, watching her drink herself into a stupor was killing me. I first thought she couldn't play drunk, but the "Roofies" plot kicked in, and it made more sense. It still didn't stop the movie from being bad. -
fallnangel210 — 21 years ago(August 28, 2004 09:48 PM)
I totally agree. Nudity is naturalwe are all born in the nude. I don't see what the problem with it is. I think there's a problem with people blowing other people up and shooting peoplethat ISN'T natural.
I think it's unfair that parents teach their kids to be embarassed and even ashamed of their bodieswe are always taught to cover up, not let anyone see, and being naked is "inapropriate" and "gross." When I have kids, I'll never make them feel like their bodies are ugly. Granted, I won't tell them to walk around naked, but they won't be embarassed when seeing breasts in a movie and say "eww" like most people I know (adults included).
Now back on topicthere isn't much nudity in the film, not enough to be bad for a 10 year old. I'd be more concerned about the whole plot and death and such than anything else. Definitely not a movie I'd show a 10 year old. -
noizyme — 21 years ago(August 27, 2004 05:53 PM)
You see the side of her breast for a split second, no nipple. The sex scenes are few and not graphic, although the scenes have her struggling at times. And you see some guy's butt for 2 seconds. That's it. Nothing crazy.
-
-
toothpastelaser — 13 years ago(February 21, 2013 10:11 AM)
You did the right thing by not renting it for them without checking on IMDB boards first. I got into trouble when I took out "up the yin yang" for some kids around here. Luckily mom and dad were too "scared" to press charges
