What's with the CG WOUNDS???

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bullet to the Head

---

TVippy — 12 years ago(November 27, 2013 08:17 AM)

Are they cheaper and easier to create? Oldschool practical effects looked so much better (although, many a times less realistic). These just feel CHEAP and AMATEURISH (it's Youtubers level, to be honest). So why use it?
If not only for saving huge amount of money.
I own you.

[fgadmin]

jac163 — 12 years ago(January 29, 2014 01:13 PM)

Looked like red dust blowing out of the wounds. Very amateurish.

[fgadmin]

fnj2002 — 11 years ago(January 25, 2015 04:28 AM)

I think the reason nobody is reacting to this premise is because it doesn't make any sense. You say CG is often more realistic than makeup; then you complain that CG is cheap and amateurish. Which is it?

[fgadmin]

TVippy — 11 years ago(January 26, 2015 11:59 AM)

Both look unrealistic. CG also looks cheap.
I own you.