I'm guessing it was imbeciles who rated this so low.
-
gpliao-1 — 12 years ago(December 12, 2013 05:51 AM)
I don't know which movie you thought you were watching but it was NOT skyline. Because the skyline I saw was a 6/10 up until the last 5 minutes. Then it sunk to a 2 or 1/10. No closure to the plot whatsoever.
And yes, by the end of the movie(right before the dude and his gf get sucked up, finally) I wanted them to just die. Slowly and horribly and brutally. In fact, when considering how un satisfying this movie is, I wanted the aliens to set the city of Los Angeles( and earth in general) ablaze.
Since I watched this I now refer to 95% of films as "being better than skyline" - predators, army of darkness, splice, shark nado, ghost shark, two headed shark attack and even Sharkopus!!!
Skyline is not even so bad it's good. Instead skyline is soo bad you will want to punch whomever suggested watching it, ask for your time back and then watch it in reverse in an attempt to get some sort of closure. -
silovik812 — 12 years ago(February 17, 2014 06:07 PM)
I kept feeling like
Skyline
was the second part of a trilogy, of which we never got to see the first part. It's obvious that the ending was the setup for a sequel, and if the makers of this film could come up with a prequel film, this one would make more sense."Oh, well" said Zanoni, "to pour pure water in the muddy well does but disturb the mud !"
-
ragusa11 — 12 years ago(January 26, 2014 06:02 PM)
Mars Attacks sucked and it was meant to be a parody. This movie sucked at it wasn't original. It had no character or plot development. It was trying to be Cloverfield meets Independence Day. If you want good thinking sci-fi you should go watch Blade Runner.
-
Rena_Mahone — 11 years ago(February 26, 2015 07:27 PM)
I appreciated the brain harvesting as well. Loved the movie as a whole.
People not liking this movie should stick to Mars Attacks.
And Cloverfield.
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors)