Could pedophilia ever be listed as a sexual orientation?
-
micCee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:47 PM)
That has nothing to do with sexual orientation.
The term 'paedophilia' doesn't even refer to an act, whether between two consenting participants or otherwise. You knee-jerk reactionaries are incredibly ignorant.
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways. -
martytamu27 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:51 PM)
Ok fine. Then It can be considered and aberrant deviant sick sexual orientation.
Anyone that is sexually attracted to a pre pubescent individual is a sick individual and worse than a murderer if they act in their desires cause it totally beep up that person and then the cycle of lost lives expands from there. -
micCee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:55 PM)
Ok fine. Then It can be considered and aberrant deviant sick sexual orientation.
It deviates from what is optimal under evolution, as does homosexuality. I don't know if it is objectively 'sick' just because it is socially unacceptable to fulfil those desires.
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways. -
martytamu27 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:09 PM)
I agree. As a genetic trait homosexuality should not be present. Cause in the wild those that are don't get to mate and that gene isn't passed on. Humans differ. And it is passed on. Where it differs in our civilized world is that homosexuality as an orientation is conducted between other consenting individuals. Pedophilia, as a sexual orientation, cannot be carried out between to individuals that consent because one of those individuals is incapable of giving consent. Therefore it is sick and destructive. Whereas other sexual orientations. As long as it's between consenting folks. Knock yourself out. Do whatever pleases you. That is the fundamental difference between pedophilia and homosexuality.
-
gladoscake — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 10:00 PM)
I agree. As a genetic trait homosexuality should not be present. Cause in the wild those that are don't get to mate and that gene isn't passed on. Humans differ. And it is passed on. Where it differs in our civilized world is that homosexuality as an orientation is conducted between other consenting individuals. Pedophilia, as a sexual orientation, cannot be carried out between to individuals that consent because one of those individuals is incapable of giving consent. Therefore it is sick and destructive. Whereas other sexual orientations. As long as it's between consenting folks. Knock yourself out. Do whatever pleases you. That is the fundamental difference between pedophilia and homosexuality.
Though there is the theory of population control -
Cademon — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 07:35 PM)
Sexual orientation relates specifically to gender: so hetero, homo, bi, and pan (for creepy chasers).
But language doesn't necessarily have to follow any rigid laws, so it's possible in the future it might.
Maybe a lot of stuff could fit under the kinksexual category.
http://www.mtv.co.uk/pride/news/lgbtq-acronym-guide -
micCee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:49 PM)
Cademon raises a valid point, in that paedophilia doesn't relate to gender, which is what usually designates something as an orientation.
It's certainly a natural sexual proclivity though. The fact that the manifestation of paedophilia is harmful does not mean that paedophilia isn't just as natural as homosexuality or heterosexuality.
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways. -
martytamu27 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:13 PM)
It is less natural because it is with a prepubescent individual. If you're a man attracted to a man you just have the genetic programmed desire that a female has. Whatever that basis is. And as long as they consent it's not destructive to society.
Now if you're programmed to be attracted to prepubescent children then it is destructive to society and a much more abnormal trait that causes great harm to the individual and society. How can you not see the difference?
Under no circumstance would sex between and adult and a child be consensual -
micCee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:49 PM)
Whether the act of paedophilic love making could be consensual is besides the point, because nature doesn't adhere strictly to the human construct of morality.
Paedophilia occurs in nature as a deviant sexual proclivity, therefore it is natural.
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways. -
martytamu27 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 10:00 PM)
It isn't natural. It's a mutation. And an unfavorable mutation. And in the wild it wouldn't be passed on and those individuals wouldn't. E allowed to mate and would most likely be eaten by their moms at birth. Cause the mother knows which Cubs are carrying bad genes.
Humans go against nature. We let everyone live. For the most part. We go against evolution and natural selection and every genetic pressure there is.
So it isn't natural. There are more sociopaths psychopath. Pedophiles. What have you in the human race cause we don't kill our young and they are able to mate. Men with inferior genes are allowed to mate because they use money and power to get women that on their own merits wouldn't ever mate with them. So you can't say something is natural just because it exists in the human race. The human race itself is an aberration of nature. We are the only living thing that goes against nature in so many ways. We willfully destroy our own habitat for example. And it will eventually lead to our extinction. Sooner than later. -
micCee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 10:09 PM)
It isn't natural. It's a mutation. And an unfavorable mutation. And in the wild it wouldn't be passed on and those individuals wouldn't. E allowed to mate and would most likely be eaten by their moms at birth. Cause the mother knows which Cubs are carrying bad genes.
I'm not sure that it is a mutation, but in any case, mutation occurs in nature. That's how evolution happened. Do you believe that evolution is unnatural?
So it isn't natural. There are more sociopaths psychopath. Pedophiles. What have you in the human race cause we don't kill our young and they are able to mate. Men with inferior genes are allowed to mate because they use money and power to get women that on their own merits wouldn't ever mate with them. So you can't say something is natural just because it exists in the human race. The human race itself is an aberration of nature. We are the only living thing that goes against nature in so many ways. We willfully destroy our own habitat for example. And it will eventually lead to our extinction. Sooner than later.
All human behaviour is natural, including psychopathy, mental illness, criminality, parasitism, etc. We destroy the world because we are the most successful and intelligent species of parasite.
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways. -