You don't have a good enough argument to counter the points.
-
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 04:23 PM)
But you'll never keep the weight off, porky. Because you are weak.
You like dirty fighting? That's what you and your buddies here do. Fat shaming is not much different from telling someone not to breed.
Intelligence? You're not in my league.
How about sticking to the subject? Should a parent let their 5-year-old be subject to attacks from an animal? -
AnnotatedSPN — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:17 PM)
Wait
You rezzed a 2 year old thread about a woman who certainly wasn't raising her kids right and was tormenting a poor cat JUST to insult SG and use fatphobic rethoric as if you were a 10 year old bully in elementary school?
Man, that is the most pathetic thing I've seen in my life.
And to stay in subject? Someone who chooses to have children AND take care of an animal should first educate the children so that they do not provoke the animal into attacking them. I have a 5 year old niece, and despite the fact that one of my cats is a bit skittish around people, we've never had any problem with the cat attacking my niece becuause my niece HAS been taught not to torment the cat. It is as easy as that. -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:26 PM)
You rezzed a 2 year old thread about a woman who certainly wasn't raising her kids right and was tormenting a poor cat
Someone who chooses to have children AND take care of an animal should first educate the children so that they do not provoke the animal into attacking them.
Watch the particular episode before you comment, dummy. That kid was fine. He was a sweet kid who never abused the cat. The cat was abusing him.
This is what I mean. You cat ladies are all so biased you're making stuff up that never happened on the episode. What the fck is wrong with you? You all sound alike. You're morons all sharing the same substandard brain.
Now I'll get silence, I bet. -
AnnotatedSPN — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:50 PM)
Interesting how you don't defend the fact that you STILL rezzed a 2 year old thread in order to prove yourself "better" than "cat ladies".
Now, let me educate you:
Animals in general are territorial. That includes humans, btw. When an animal has PTSD from previous mishandling (and it's been a LONG time since I Saw the episode, so I may be missremembering but the cat was a rescue animal, wasn't he?) the FIRST thing one learns is to give them their space. And that includes NOT PLAYING in the exact same room that the animal has chosen as his safe space (because if the animal is under the bed? He is hiding from danger. He is protecting itself)
Simple ettiquete around animals is not that hard.
What would've been WRONG is to teach the kid that he had the right to do whatever he wanted around the cat, and then get rid of the cat just because the kid can't be taught something as simple as "don't pester the cat". -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 06:29 PM)
Interesting how you don't defend the fact that you STILL rezzed a 2 year old thread in order to prove yourself "better" than "cat ladies".
There's nothing wrong with doing that. Old threads on imdb are rejoined all the time. I was in the neighborhood to answer someone who answered me on another thread, and I couldn't resist.
Sounds like you are somewhat familiar with the episode. If you know it, tell us which one it is. Skeksis Girl thinks I made it up.
When an animal has PTSD from previous mishandling the FIRST thing one learns is to give them their space.
The cat was blind and it had PTSD, but not from human mishandling. The five year old boy tried to pet it just as a really loud noise from a truck occurred (they were outside). If you can believe Jackson, this one event caused the cat to be nervous with PTSD and violent from then on.
While some young children do abuse pets, this wasn't the case here at all.
the FIRST thing one learns is to give them their space. And that includes NOT PLAYING in the exact same room that the animal has chosen as his safe space (because if the animal is under the bed? He is hiding from danger. He is protecting itself)
It's the boy's room. He should have to move out for an animal? Should he sleep on the couch? No. Keep the animal out of his room.
The parents did nothing to separate cat and boy, and protect their son. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:22 PM)
If the mother did not teach the kid proper etiquette around animals. And the kid did something to have the animal attack him. It is not the animal's fault.
When I was five I scared the living crap out of my dog because I went to kiss him when he was sleeping. His tooth went through my lip, I needed stitches and I still have a scar from it.
It wasn't the dog's fault I was an idiot.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:31 PM)
If the mother did not teach the kid proper etiquette around animals. And the kid did something to have the animal attack him. It is not the animal's fault.
Did you watch the episode? No, you couldn't have. Because you have the facts wrong. Or else you're in deep denial like the rest of these people.
The kid on the episode did nothing to provoke the cat. He merely sat on the floor playing quietly in his room. The cat stalked him repeatedly from under the bed and attacked him, scratching and biting. For no reason. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 06:39 PM)
You never said which episode it was. If it was the one with the Cat that had PTSD and was partially blind, still not the cat's fault.
YOU are the one who keeps making claims but not giving us details.
So don't give us crap when you can't even provide details.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 07:11 PM)
We've been through this before. You guys don't really want details because then you'll have to admit to something you don't want to admit to. You'd rather just remain in ignorance so you can keep believing that the kid provoked the cat.
I don't remember what the cat's name or the kid's name was or what the episode number was and season was. Who cares? I gave accurate the details. You just don't want to accept that pet attacks can be unprovoked and that a mother and father didn't protect their young child.
You can find the episode if you look elsewhere in the thread, nunchucks, or whatever that idiot is called, identified it. She is in denial about the details, too. She'd rather just blame the kid, it's makes her more comfortable.
Cat ladies. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 08:51 PM)
No. You didn't. When asked you refused. You are just looking for a reason to attack defenseless animals.
Keep claiming you are on some moral higher ground. Because you're not and never will be.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 08:59 PM)
What did I refuse?To identify the episode? I can't, I'm not a big fan of this show. There aren't that many episodes, you big fans should be able to find it. Numnuts knows which one it is, why don't you ask her? If you really want to know.
You are just looking for a reason to attack defenseless animals.
What about defenseless kids? -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 09:17 PM)
There are currently 72 Episodes that have aired. If YOU cannot provide which episode, then that is on you. So far the only ep that came close to what you claimed was the cat with PTSD, which Jackson fixed with the mother and son.
You on the other hand would just condemn that cat to death. Says a lot about you.
I once rescued a mother cat and kittens. The mother cat attacked me once because I held her wrong. It was my fault. I didn't punish her for that. I have been bitten by dogs, birds, horses, rats, cats, and snakes. 9 times out of 10, it's my fault.
As for defenseless kids, the kid I am thinking of wasn't entirely defenseless, and if I remember correctly, he didn't want the cat sent away either.
If you can't handle an animal and a kid, then if you have one, don't get the other. Don't abuse the animal because you're a selfish, useless, idiot who doesn't want to learn proper care and feeding.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 18, 2016 11:35 AM)
Nope. I was talking in general. Like you were. Not this fictional kid that you claim is there but is not. Until you grt the name of the exact episode, you are just screaming about BS. You made the claim. Show us exactly where it happened or we can just chalk it up to your delusions.
Something is wrong with you. But everyone else knew that. I mean seriously. Rezzing a two year old thread because you have issues. Not enough attention at home?
Here are the facts. You don't know what ep you are talking about. You just want to kill animals because you are too selfish and stupid to deal with them. You have shown that you can't handle animals and you can't handle people. You would do yourself a favor by getting some help and never owning pets or having kids until you learn common decency.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 08:41 AM)
I don't know what kind of looney comes to a board to make up a lie and then talk about it, but I'm not one of them. That would be sick. So you think I made up the episode. That IS sick.
nunya knows the episode, ask her. The only thing she and I agreed on is that I had the right episode.
You're in denial. You just don't believe that a pet can ever, EVER be mean, fierce, and unmanageable on its own. If that's what you believe, you haven't been around much. I'm not saying many pets are like this, but there is a minority of pet animals that are naturally crummy pets.
If certain people can be crazy, mean, savage, why not certain pets? -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 11:06 AM)
I don't know what kind of looney comes to a board to make up a lie and then talk about it, but I'm not one of them. That would be sick. So you think I made up the episode. That IS sick.
Yes, I think you make up a lot of things, especially since you rezzed a two year dead thread just to attack me.
Yes, you are a loony.
I believe that animals can be dangerous, but you're claiming them to be psychotic. You show that you don't care to learn a thing about animals and just rather get rid of them. Your complete ignorance towards animals is borderline psychopathic.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 01:58 PM)
Yes, I think you make up a lot of things, especially since you rezzed a two year dead thread just to attack me.
What has one got to do with the other?
I believe that animals can be dangerous, but you're claiming them to be psychotic.
I never used that word, you did. Animals can be dangerous and unsalvageable - you can't fix some of them.
So what would
you
do with dangerous animals?
Why don't you ask business nunya which episode it was? Because you're scared you'll have to look at it and see that I'm right?