You don't have a good enough argument to counter the points.
-
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 08:51 AM)
You just want to kill animals because you are too selfish and stupid to deal with them.
I would get no enjoyment from killing animals but sometimes it is necessary. How about when a dog has killed a person? It makes sense to "put it to sleep."
Animals were killed to create pets. Wild animals were culled, the ones with the worst qualities eliminated, over hundreds of generations. That left only the good, docile, sociable ones to be pets and to give birth to more of the same.
Without culling, you wouldn't even have pets.
All dogs would be wolves and all cats would be some ancient wild form of cat, and you couldn't live with those.
This is historic and scientific fact. It's undeniable. You can read about it everywhere. If you deny this you might as well believe the earth is flat and there is no point in talking rationally to you. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 11:11 AM)
I would get no enjoyment from killing animals but sometimes it is necessary. How about when a dog has killed a person? It makes sense to "put it to sleep."
My mom once had a dog growing up. It was a gentle dog. Her neighbors were scared of it because she was an English sheep dog, big. So they would show up and beat the dog with chains. The dog bit one of the neighbors. The dog was "put down" for defending itself from people who were hurting it.
If an animal kills a human and isn't rabid, usually it's because the animal has been beaten or trained to kill. There are some times when there might be an issue, but usually it's because the owner was abusive. Destroying the animal because of the owner's evil is not the answer.
Selective Breeding is why we have pets. You don't have to kill the ones with the things we don't want.
But hey, you just want to kill animals and be right, so you lower yourself to being below an animal by insulting and fat shaming someone because you have no one else to talk to.
Seriously. Get help, don't have kids, and never own pets.
I'm done talking to the animal killing psychopath that you are.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 02:07 PM)
Stop talking, and listen, then.
You claim to know all these cases where people mistreated pets and thus made them dangerous (and why should I believe all this if you don't believe me?).
That does not mean that some pets aren't naturally dangerous without any help. You can't prove that in every case of a bad pet, that a human caused it. That's just what you want to believe.
Incidentally, even this show doesn't claim that EVERY SINGLE bad pet was made that way by a human. Not Jackson, nor anyone ever said that. It's just viewers like you who think that by some ill logic. You all keep parroting the same thing, but your claims don't hold up.
Selective Breeding is why we have pets. You don't have to kill the ones with the things we don't want.
Yes, today. But that's not how it started. Way in the past, it was done in a low tech way by cavemen. They had to kill the animals they didn't want, otherwise the unsuitable, wild-behaving animals would breed with the docile ones and produce more wild animals. If they just turned out the wild animals, they might hang around the edge of camp and mingle and mate with with the docile ones.
Every dog and cat today is not produced by selective breeding, far from it, many are produced by unspayed animals mating. There is no selection going on there. -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(August 14, 2016 10:51 AM)
Fine, now we know you are addressing Fatty. She's not listening anymore. She crumpled when I returned her name-calling style of arguing.
Anyone who can find pleasure in watching youtube videos where an animal is singled out and beaten by other animals is very disturbing and twisted. That psychopath has spammed the site with such links before.
It's also a sock account.
What the beep are you talking about? Looks like you're just another nutcase oozing out of the woodwork here. -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 26, 2016 12:18 PM)
If the mother did not teach the kid proper etiquette around animals. And the kid did something to have the animal attack him. It is not the animal's fault.
I have the patience of a saint. For the millionth time, the kid's behavior was without fault. Get this through your thick skull.
When I was five I scared the living crap out of my dog because I went to kiss him when he was sleeping. His tooth went through my lip, I needed stitches and I still have a scar from it.
It wasn't the dog's fault I was an idiot.
A six year old is not an "idiot" for the innocent action of kissing her dog. If a dog isn't good with kids, it shouldn't be brought into a household. If it bites through a kid's lip, the parents should get it out of the house because it's a danger to their kids, who should be their first priority.
Your parents did you a disservice by getting and keeping that dog. There are gentle dogs. They should have put you first. Your parents obviously did a number on you. Your thinking is twisted as a result. Your whole childhood sounds weird and violent. -
SapphEyeR — 11 years ago(November 02, 2014 02:56 PM)
On one of the shows, a woman's cat was aggressive toward the family including her son of about 7 years. The woman let the cat have the run of the boy's room and it spent a lot of time under his bed from which position it would attack him. The boy was frightened of the cat and couldn't be comfortable in his own bedroom.
What kind of mother values a cat more than her young son?