this movie sucks
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Starlet
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(April 25, 2016 06:19 PM)
first of all, the dumbest thing about this movie is why wouldn't a girl who stole cash from an old woman just give it back to her if she ended up feeling bad for stealing it from her? why would she instead of giving it back or part of it back become her friend?
and then the part that really didn't make sense is after the old woman got upset after taking care of the girl's dog(which they also never explained, because what made the woman so upset she didn't want to be friends with the girl anymore?)and she didn't want to be friends with the girl anymore the girl was desperate to remain friends with her and even bought a plane ticket for the old woman and did everything she could to get her to go with her. uh what? and she didn't feel bad about taking her money or spending it because if she did either one of those things then why didn't she show it at all? no once did she have a look of guilt over taking the woman's money. all of these things made me so irritated while watching this movie.
also, why in the world did that dumb brunette roommate of the main girl go to the old woman's house to tell her that her friend wasn't really friends with her? what on earth could of motivated her to do that? and what on earth could she have gained from doing that?
also the casting of porn stars in this movie playing themselves is so wrong and so unrealistic. it totally takes you out of the reality of a serious movie when there is a cameo in it, which means when an actor or porn star plays themselves in a serious movie. cameos only work in non serious comedies. in the end credits to this movie it was so stupid how they casted all the porn stars they casted as themselves in this serious movie. plus it's really tacky putting porn stars in a movie about the porn industry. and it's too obvious; doing this also. I don't know why they always have to do this tired, clich thing with legitimate movies.
another problem I have with this movie that makes it bad is the extremely unrealistic, fake sex scene with the main character. that was the most fake looking sex scene I've ever seen in a movie. I mean there are more realistic looking sex scenes in soft core porn movies and THAT is saying something. it's so choreographed and acted out looking. and it looks so fake in the angles, positioning, and blocking of all nudity and blocking to block the fact that it's not real sex. it has the most fake looking blocking that I've ever seen in a sex scene.
another problem I have with this movie is how the main character didn't show any freaking nudity in her sex scene??? so, she's a porn star who doesn't show nudity in her sex scenes??? also, why did they cast porn stars in non sex scenes but cast an actress in a role in which she has sex in a porn video and she doesn't ever show any nudity in it???!!! the problem is with authenticity and realism and the girl who they casted as a porn star didn't have sex in a realistic way at all given the fact that she never showed any nudity. I mean come on! cast only an actress willing and able to show nudity in her freaking porn video sex scene! that's backwards logic casting in that the porn stars don't have sex in a porn video sex scene and the actress does have sex in a porn video sex scene but doesn't ever show nudity in it.
also, the main blonde girl actress is not good looking enough to be a porn star. my gosh, most of the time when I looked at her face in close up and in a medium range, regular shot I thought she is very plain looking and too average looking and too homely to be an actress. and if I thought that then her being a porn star is even more far fetched and unrealistic as porn star have to be even more beautiful than actresses. case in point: Alison pill. I mean the main girl in this movie is so average looking and homely that looking at her eyes was sometimes painful. I mean even 7s in movies look more attractive than her in this movie. she's a 6.
also, why did her roommate always act so retarded, juvenile, uneducated, non classy, immature, and irrational? she acts like a 12 year old. she is not realistic at all because women 18 or older never act that stupid and out of reality.
6.8???!!! are you kidding me? this rating is so stupid and so incorrect, so wrong, and inaccurate and is so undeserved. this rating makes me so mad because it doesn't deserve it and mostly because movies that do deserve it get like 3.5 or 4.5 ratings on here instead. -
kidjay83 — 9 years ago(May 13, 2016 10:09 AM)
rating is way too high and have no respect any film maker who injects porn into their films under the guise of "being artistic" Porn isn't artistic .He started off with a solid enough story and then went south by throwing in a real porn scene .I guess he had the same producer over his shoulder encouraging to pander to "perverted audience" that neil marshall had this he had a good movie and he went and trashed it with porn.Well i'm not stupid and im not with supporting someone who thinks hes smarter than me i will not have my intelligence insulted so i rate this movie a 1/10 .Im a fanof stella maeve too i thinks shes a super cutie i kind of lost a bit of respect for her after seeing her in a project like this
I love having some mystery to the character without having to question who he is " -
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(May 14, 2016 11:11 AM)
in what way do you think the director was thinking he's smarter than you? stella maeve is so lovely in this movie. oh my gosh, I loved her even more than dree Hemingway. she is so exotically and naturally beautiful and is so quirky, cute, funny, and lovable in this film. you're right the porn in this film is so wrong and horrible and it's indefendable and unforgivable. and it was completely unnecessary. they could've just shown an inexplicit and short scene of sex or just say something about it. there is no need, ever in a legitimate movie to show hardcore porn.