Obvious troll, but still I'm amazed by this question. How can one even come up with something like this and be serious w
-
spencermalley935 — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 07:19 AM)
the better Batman movies had him killing people.
Good thing that's not actually the case.
Other than being in a time crunch and, instead of busting azz to get the bomb out of there, standing around listening to Miranda's last word
Yeah, that's not even close. -
justanicknamed — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 07:35 AM)
Good thing that's not actually the case.
Which is it?
so is Keaton, considering he murdered
the better Batman movies had him killing people.
Other than being in a time crunch and, instead of busting azz to get the bomb out of there, standing around listening to Miranda's last word
Yeah, that's not even close.
Oh, so I dreamed that? Whew!!! Thank GOD! That means that it didn't actually happen!
I dreamed that after Baleman murdered the truck driver and it crashed to the street below, they opened the cab of the truck and Miranda was bleeding and crunched in there awkwardly as if her back were broken. Baleman, Gordum and big-mouth Catwoman stood there for a minute or two while Miranda talked about how she won or some other cr*p like that. Then Baleman went and hooked up the bomb which had been ticking down the whole time, said goodbye to Gordum, and flew the bomb away.
That is a really vivid dream I had. -
FMT — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 07:45 AM)
I really don't get how this guy acts like Batman having no "no kill rule" is the exception to the rule, when only 2 out of 8 live action movies (post-66) focus on it. Even in BB we saw the development of said rule yet just in the LoS headquarters alone he killed more bad guys than he did in any other movie, because, in his words, it was necessary! It's ok if you prefer it, but don't forget about the numbers, when it comes to live action Batman the "no kill rule" is the exception to the rule, not the other way around, like it or not! Not to mention it has nothing to do with an actor's portrayal of the character. Not to mention it doesn't affect the objective quality of the movie in any way, it's not a contradiction if it's never mentioned in the first place. Not to mention oh, why do I bother?
-
justanicknamed — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 07:54 AM)
Well, I don't know what to tell you since I dreamed that whole sequence with them standing around the cab of the truck waiting for Miranda to finish with her speech before getting the bomb out of there.
-
FMT — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 06:55 AM)
No response to what, exactly? Justnicknamed's post is the only response to mine, and he's not asking for a reply. Or are you talking about the last thread? Because if that's the case I haven't even read your post, like I said I wouldn't before I abandoned the thread. Wait, I clearly said I would be leaving, since I had nothing more to say, and you still posted something?! And now you're here, on a different board for a different movie, complaining about my lack of reply? That's sad I guess not much use in getting the last word if the other guy isn't even aware of it, is there? Man, the more you post the more pathetic you become, constantly following me around, baiting me, confronting me and insulting me on unrelated threads, assuming I read every message on these boards as soon as they're posted, and all for what? Because I dared to state the obvious, that superhero action adventures are not among the types of movie that get to be considered the best in cinema history? And I'm the troll?! Get a life, you lunatic! You're worse than an ex-girlfriend!
-
oblivionass — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 08:23 AM)
Fantasy films don't usually get get considered to be one of the greatest films ever either. However like anything there are times a mold gets broken and there are exceptions to the rule. Lord of the Rings is considered one of the best films ever.
-
woozle_wuzzle — 9 years ago(November 15, 2016 09:24 PM)
Considering you said FAIL to the person that mentioned Bale.
You apparently think Bale was good?
Oh yeah, the Batman that MOST of society makes fun of because of his dumb voice and LACK of being Batman
Good God, you're an idiot.
Clearly you're insecure about what a piece of sh!t you are, and the fact that most women hate you. But it's not your fault, it's theirs for being SJW attention seekers, right?
I DARE you to call me a liberal or compare me to anyone from the states.
We all make fun of people like you, by the way. You provide us with a plethora of entertainment.
lol triggered ^
Get to your safe space, son. You need to recover from that meltdown. -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 10, 2017 04:31 AM)
Considering you said FAIL to the person that mentioned Bale.
You apparently think Bale was good?
You think there is something wrong with that?
Oh yeah, the Batman that MOST of society makes fun of because of his dumb voice
Pete Holmes is not "MOST of the society". Besides, that's not really an argument against Bale's Batman portrayal. That's like making an argument against Tobey Maquire as Spider-Man by presenting memes with his crying face. It doesn't take away anything from what he brought to the character.
and LACK of being Batman
I wonder if those are the same people who think that Michele Pfeiffer's Catwoman is more accurate to the comics than Ann Hathaway's because she acts like a cat.
Good God, you're an idiot.
Why? Because he has an opinion?
Clearly you're insecure about what a piece of sh!t you are
For someone who talks about insecurities of others, you seem pretty insecure about someone's opinion.
and the fact that most women hate you.
You must be a really fun person. -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 10, 2017 04:22 AM)
I wouldn't say that either of them was the "worst". But if we're talking about who was the least Batman out of all, it's definitely Affleck. Whether you think that Keaton was sidelined in his movies by his villains, you have to agree that his character at least had something going on. You did understand him and his motives. With Affleck, his character is all about the aesthetic but no substance whatsoever. The worst thing out of all is that his Batman actually was made into sadist who enjoys hurting people. I don't know who are those people who claim that Affleck in BvS is "The Definitive Batman", but they certainly don't understand the character of Batman outside his superficial characteristics. Batman doesn't fight people because it stimulates his sick desire for pain and torture. Batman fights criminals because it's the only way to solve the problem, not because he enjoys doing that. If there are other ways for him to handle situation, he won't fight anybody.
-
BatesMT — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 04:57 AM)
Keaton was pretty good, especially when you consider he did actual detective work to figure out how to beat the Joker's poison, and he figured out who he was, and a few other things throughout the movie.
Ben didn't do an ounce of detective work among being easily manipulated and completely unreasonable being driven by blind hatred. Ben was by far the worst Batman I have ever seen. -
OdumC — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 06:42 AM)
I'd normally vote Clooney til I saw Suicide Squad, but "Batman" using a child as a human shield against a gun pointed at him is inexcusable.
If they somehow struck that scene out, Affleck would be one of the better ones, but as-is, the absolute irrefutable worst.Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick