http://ign.com/articles/2016/11/02/ant-man-director-disappointed-giant-man-made-debut-in-civil-war
-
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(November 04, 2016 03:33 PM)
So? there's a guy running around here with Captain America as his profile pic claiming it makes him "unbiased" but when asked, doesn't know central characters from the story. his reply? "I don't like the movies or comics" so wtf are you a fan of? the breakfast cereal? Oh wait.. sorry, that's BvS that had the kids breakfast cereal.
Sentry is not a very popular comic book character. So in order to know him, let alone to put him on your profile, I think you'd have to be a fan of Marvel in one way or another. However, I pointed this out not because someone had Marvel character on his profile, but because you made unprecedented remark about DCEU when no one was asking about DCEU. I guess that is how your delusional mindset works. "When someone points finger at MCU, I point finger at DCEU, since that is the only logic I am familiar with."
but the avatar is concrete proof of their preference to an idiot.
Well, only an idiot would assume that the point of my response was about avatar.
Sentry's a known troll. anyone with an IQ over, say, Turnip would have read his post and figured that out, instead of seeing a Sentry avatar and thinking "OH He's automatically a Marvel Fan! derp derp!!"
Again, wasn't the point, dummy. My point was more about your hyperbolic mindset that makes you automatically mention DC at every time when someone points out the flaws of the MCU. Your logic: When someone tells that my crap stinks, I tell them, "No, it's your crap stinks."Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick Your profile status just screams "I'm not a salty MCU fanboy". -
BatesMT — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 06:25 AM)
Despite the fact the sequel is giving us Wasp? That's not enough of a premiere that the sequel just had to have Giant-Man also?
Personally the inclusion of Giant-Man in Civil War made that battle even more spectacular than it was. They were obviously trying to create something memorable with that battle and they definitely nailed it. -
OdumC — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 08:58 AM)
Ater MoS pretty much every single move DC has made has been panicked but that dumbass thinks because they decided to expand on Ant-Man's power in civil war, that's a "panic move"
Marvel is leading the way, they keep hitting it out of the park with every film even the unknown properties no one cares about become some of their best films. (GotG, Dr. Strange) and this idiot thinks they "panic"
I'd laugh at these children if I wasn't already disgusted by my tax dollars going to waste supporting their brain damaged asses.Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick -
CichlidAsh — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 04:07 PM)
I can understand why the Ant-Man director would feel disappointed as it demonstrates one of the other extremes of Ant-Mans powers which I am sure he would have liked to have debuted himself. However just because you are directing the movie featuring a certain character I don't think that means you get to own that character and in a shared universe each character is up for being used for the best effect they can add to each movie. Ant-Man turning into a giant was very effective in Civil War and the airport scene.
Marvel panicked and cost the Ant-Man sequel its 'Giant-Man' premiere.
Panicked by what exactly care to explain a bit on that one?
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock -
wallacesawyer — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 07:12 PM)
Great. Why is that on this board?
Anything that might make Marvel Studios look bad gives the OP a boner.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/ -
OdumC — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 03:13 PM)
Not sure what this has to do with Batman V Superman other than to attract the resident trolls.
Looks like he finally bagged one too.Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick -
wallacesawyer — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 07:17 PM)
I think the director has been open about wanting to keep Ant-Man as a more stand alone series, with shared universe references kept to a minimal. Apparently that sort of stuff may have been why Jon Favreau had such a hard time making IRON MAN 2.
I liked seeing Giant-Man in CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, though. It would've sucked waiting to see that in ANT-MAN AND THE WASP.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/