Uncircumcised Plot Point…..really?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bad Moms
Bella_the_Queen — 9 years ago(July 13, 2016 08:44 PM)
In the trailer when Mila Kunis says "what if I get someone not circumcised" it shows her on a date with a guy. Are they really gonna make a plot point out of her having sex with an uncut guy? And she doesn't know how to deal with it? Really? That's so dumb
-
JameGumbisSilent — 9 years ago(July 14, 2016 01:14 PM)
The easiest thing to do when your panties are in a bunch is to just reach down and pull them out of your crack. Problem solved!
Or, you can always go on a message board for a dumb comedy and complain about a joke that offended you.
it rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again -
Shuggy — 9 years ago(August 01, 2016 02:49 PM)
It's not that it "offended me". It's that it promotes the stereotype that men with complete genitals (like most European film stars) are dirty and to be shunned (or pitied and condescended to), and worse, that cutting baby boys' genitals to save them from that fate is a good thing to do.
All that is visible must grow beyond itself
http://www.cafepress.co.uk/ahua/8761658 -
edgehillcm — 9 years ago(August 13, 2016 03:04 PM)
Sex as nature intended it:
http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/ -
esdeguz-1 — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 11:34 AM)
Well I am offended that you infer that circumcised men as have incomplete genitals, and like it or not at this time ,they are weird. As less boys get cut it will change. Also honestly, it's not like being circumcised is the worst thing that could happen to guy.
-
DisturbedPixie — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 03:27 PM)
Circumcision has and does kill babies, so yes, it can be the worse thing in a baby's extremely short life. 100+ infant deaths a year in the US alone from an electable procedure that's done without pain relief aka baby torture.
And yes circumcised boys have mutilated incomplete genitals. What the beep else do you call genitals that have had a piece cut off because the inventor of corn flakes didn't want boys masturbating. He also wanted to pour acid on baby girl's genitals but luckily that didn't catch on, though if it did you would be offended that people don't think that's normal. You're really sickening. -
VariaIronhawk — 9 years ago(July 14, 2016 07:43 PM)
I don't like the way it is done at all. There are an awful lot of men who are not circumcised and that's unnecessary. The script was written by men, who clearly are circumcised. What a pity that they thought this was funny. It is a process that was designed to discourage masturbation, why are we still doing it when it has been proven that there is no reason. Uncut guys are actually kind of hot.
I'm a bitey, Mad Lady or Sexy, because biting is like kissing except there's a winner. -
sinceimetjc — 9 years ago(July 23, 2016 02:31 PM)
Circumcision did not become the norm in the United States until Dr. Kellogg began promoting it as a way to deter masturbation. Then it took off! And somewhere down the line, doctors began telling people that it was cleaner. Which if you ask Europeans, Latin Americans, and Asians if they think it's cleaner, they'd laugh because most of their men are intact. Did it exist before Kellogg? Yes. But Jews and Muslims were pretty much the only people who did it to their babies before the early 1900's.
"The hideousness of that foot will haunt my dreams forever." -
-
Bella_the_Queen — 9 years ago(July 24, 2016 06:07 AM)
Actually no. Uncircumcised guys WASH their penises, keeping them clean. Circumcised guys assume they don't have to, so they don't even wash it. And uncircumcised gives a softer sensation in sex, while circumcised feels like a hard knob.
-
Zalophus — 9 years ago(July 27, 2016 07:50 PM)
Actually no. Uncircumcised guys WASH their penises, keeping them clean. Circumcised guys assume they don't have to, so they don't even wash it.
What the hell are you talking about? That's a dirty person problem, not a circumcision one. I'm circumcised and I wash myself everytime I'm in the shower. You know, since I'm not a caveman. If the guys you've been with don't keep themselves clean, maybe you need to find better guys.
But what the person you are responding to is saying is true more or less. It's objectively easier to keep cleaner when you're circumcised. -
cold2005 — 9 years ago(October 18, 2016 12:58 AM)
Being uncut, and Ive read this countless times on forums over the years, generally uncut has more sensation and feels more during masturbation/sex. Cut guys lose a lot of the sensation since their "heads" are constantly touching their underwear or pants, etc., during their whole lives, making it lose sensitivity. The downside is that then during wanking or sex, you feel less. So Im glad I am uncut. Also there are a lot of types of uncut guys, the worst possibility being when you cant pull your skin back. If thats the case, those are the guys you hear about where it 'smells' or is unclean, etc. Luckily, I can pull mine back very easily and during sex (fully hard) it pulls almost all the way back by itself from the expanding. So probably Im in a smaller percentage of uncut guys who got just the right amount of foreskin and flexibility. Also yes, if you wash it properly like it should be every day, there is no smell or anything. Never had a complaint from women, in fact been told its cleaner than some guys theyve met who were cut! And also been told the foreskin feels good while sex, kind of like a ribbed condom. So make of this what you will.
-
Kevin_PSO — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 08:54 AM)
Luckily, I can pull mine back very easily and during sex (fully hard) it pulls almost all the way back by itself from the expanding. So probably Im in a smaller percentage of uncut guys who got just the right amount of foreskin and flexibility.
You're in the majority, most uncut guys have flexible skin that can pull itself back with an erection including myself. The ones who have a foreskin that's so tight they can't pull it back are a minority who suffer from conditions like phimosis. Even then circumcision isn't the cure, since the problem can be solved with stretching exercises instead.
PSN ID: Kev_Cypunk
-
binkpanther — 9 years ago(July 27, 2016 04:41 AM)
You should probably read a book that's been written within fifty years about this subject. Actually even the smegma within the foreskin you think is so dirty, is there for a reason and serves a beneficial purpose. Obviously people wash it off nowadays, but in the past it provided lubrication and also it contains anti-bacterial enzymes.
Personally I think anyone who gets their baby boy circumcised is a monster and should get a public flogging in a town square. Now, I understand religious freedoms are important, and so religious people should be allowed to do it. But anyone doing it without a religious reason, I will shame and think very little off their parenting skills or logical reasoning, so they know just how stupid they are being or were. I will also silently hate everyone who hurts little babies and their own flesh and blood like that. By next century, circumcision will be made illegal, as it always should have been.