Lithgow as Churchill? You must be joking!
-
Newton820 — 9 years ago(November 30, 2016 10:28 AM)
I liked the bit best where no-one agreed with you so you threw a tantrum.
I also liked the bit where you complained about posters arguing with you in an argument you started and participated in and then told them to get a life for arguing!
Oh stop it, please. I can hardly breathe!!!
It would be shame if you let this one experience stop you from expressing your opinion on here again because it was entertaining after all, and what is life without entertainment.
I'm Brian and so is my wife! -
triplegrim — 9 years ago(December 08, 2016 01:55 PM)
Lithglow is Perfect as the older, more beffudled Churchill. His size is a good Visual tool, to establish the overwhelming respect and presence he commanded after the war, being the man who led them through the blitz.
-
vapor8 — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 04:06 AM)
What a butthurt douch. Lol
My Top TV Series Of All Time:
http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000012/flat/259033940 -
tinagchristensen — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 01:58 PM)
In the beginning of this thread I was taught a lesson by OP - I had the nerve to say that John Lithgow's performance was sublime and was told I know nothing about acting or anything. Well John just won a SAG Award - guess the Screen Actors don't know anything about acting either. Anyway CONGRATULATONS John Lithgow - you really deserved this honour. Oh yes!!
-
runforfree — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 04:28 PM)
They know or maybe they don't, but it's well known that if you have the right image and suck up to the right people you'll get an award. So many brilliant actors are overlooked while mediocre ones win especially the SAG awards. That being said john lithgow deserves his win. He's great in the role but truthfully any great british actor could do the role justice.