Brady is The GOAT, he liked Montana and Young as kid and he is better than both.
-
bigbadwolf666 — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 04:07 AM)
beep yea. The eye test is better than someone's elses eyes. The stat sheet isnt always right. Look at all reviews, scandals, bs that is out there. An inside the park home run looks like an out the park on paper. How many times have you seen a pitcher throw an awful game but it looks good on paper? A runner get lucky because the defender slipped? A blown base stealers call? A blown strike call? Foul calls that didnt happen? How many times have you seen calls that shouldve been reversed not? Commentators say something foolish that is not whats going on? Keen fans can detect anything while many others cannot. How many times have boxers been robbed? Judges and referes paid off? Inflated numbers for players and teams? They show one thing and it is another with a slight of hand. A Rod is considered clutch on paper along with many many other players while some good clutch hitters are considered strugglers.
Brady doesnt have the best legs, strongest arm, or isnt the most intelligent player. Its not hard to see why many think his overrated and you obviously are blinded by him.
Why am I such a misfit? I am not just a nitwit. -
HeHatesShe — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 04:19 AM)
beep* yea. The eye test is better than someone's elses eyes. The stat sheet isnt always right. Look at all reviews, scandals, bs that is out there. An inside the park home run looks like an out the park on paper. How many times have you seen a pitcher throw an awful game but it looks good on paper? A runner get lucky because the defender slipped? A blown base stealers call? A blown strike call? Foul calls that didnt happen? How many times have you seen calls that shouldve been reversed not? Commentators say something foolish that is not whats going on? Keen fans can detect anything while many others cannot. How many times have boxers been robbed? Judges and referes paid off? Inflated numbers for players and teams? They show one thing and it is another with a slight of hand. A Rod is considered clutch on paper along with many many other players while some good clutch hitters are considered strugglers.
A 16 year fluke? Is that what you're going with?
Brady doesnt have the best legs, strongest arm, or isnt the most intelligent player.
No one ever said he did or was. But your excuses hardly explain why he has had the success never before seen.
He was also a 6th round draft pick. But that doesn't matter, either. He is arguably the greatest of all time. And as another GOAT once sang: "people throw rocks at things that shine." -
bigbadwolf666 — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 10:03 AM)
never before seen? wtf. I already said he doesnt have the best talent. And stats, just a number sheet all of them have been surpassed.
You act like he's a miracle. Forgetting that his records is tainted and that he never had natural success. Even today, you cant accept it as him being good because has already been caught cheating multiple times. You can never trust a player like that forever his career is a sham.
The only argument you still have is him having won 4sb's going for 6. Tainted. All I gotta say is Montana or Bradshaw. If we talk about anything else I can easily say a bunch guys better than this fool.
He was as 6th round pick because he sucks. He didnt even go to college to learn or to have a good career. Many great players even go undrafted. Thats not to say he is the only one and the greatest off all time because the teams oversaw him a million rounds. If he was so damn good he wouldnt have to cheat at all and his talent alone wouldve gotten him higher in the draft while having so many with less stats cheat through the history of the draft go higher than him.
Why am I such a misfit? I am not just a nitwit. -
HeHatesShe — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 11:15 AM)
never before seen? wtf. I already said he doesnt have the best talent. And stats, just a number sheet all of them have been surpassed.
Yes, success never before seen. 6 superbowls, 10 championship games, 13 division titles, 0 losing seasons. Success never before seen.
You act like he's a miracle. Forgetting that his records is tainted and that he never had natural success. Even today, you cant accept it as him being good because has already been caught cheating multiple times. You can never trust a player like that forever his career is a sham.
Very few people, and even fewer who's opinion I respect, believe any of that.No proof has ever been given that spygate helped Brady in game. Brady's record is even better after spygate. And no one believes a couple psi turn an average QB into a HOF QB. That's preposterous. You are being preposterous. Probably deliberately, but I'll continue since you spent so much time on your post.
The only argument you still have is him having won 4sb's going for 6. Tainted. All I gotta say is Montana or Bradshaw. If we talk about anything else I can easily say a bunch guys better than this fool.
Both great quarterbacks. Helped out by having HOF receivers and tight ends their while career, and no salary cap to compete against, but I'm not arguing them getting to 4 superbowls isn't great. You're the one saying getting to 6 isn't great.
He was as 6th round pick because he sucks.
And yet, here he is now, breaking more records.
To paraphrase a different GOAT:
Someday Brady will win his 6th superbowl ring,
And all you're ever gonna be is green.
Why you gotta be so green? -
Rey_Kahuka — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 11:25 AM)
You're wasting your time trying to reason with a guy who says things like:
No doubt. Fagot bitch.
I mean seriously, this guy has the IQ of a rock. Any sensible, coherent argument based on facts is wasted on him.
The future is in the hands of a man who has none.
(As in no future, as opposed to no hands.) -
HeHatesShe — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 03:15 PM)
To answer your trolling question:
How Many times did Brady Throw More Than 5 Yard?
At least 107 out of 260 through the first 9 games he played this year. And probably a bunch of those 1-9 were over 5, as well. -
bigbadwolf666 — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 08:14 PM)
No doubt. Fagot bitch.
The guy is a dumper his entire career. Only when he had moss did he go deep and that was only because he had an allstar cast all around not counting the camera.
The guy is boring to watch and risks nothing. I rather watch marino, warner, brees. Deep passers show off arm and skill.
This guy is no gunslinger and is luckily to be in the NFL. without cameras and balls inflation he wouldnt have had a career.
The best short passer ive ever seen is bart starr.
Why am I such a misfit? I am not just a nitwit.