Really not that bad.
-
Jaguar-Wong-is-Dead — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 12:53 AM)
It's not about the amount of action, but the quality of it.
SS had better action than Dredd, for example.
It failed at a lot of other sh-t, it would have been better if it didn't I've already compared it to several comic movies don't know what else to say.
There's nothing pseudo-intellectual about the myth of objectivity. Here, read this objective review of The Stanley Parable:
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/stanley-parable-the-objective-review/
People hide behind objectivity when they can't adequately express what they liked or disliked about something. -
Mats_Thy_Wit — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 02:01 AM)
Your argument for the "myth of objectivity" using a joke to try and prove some point is stupid. It's as intellectually hollow as your attempt to sound smart by throwing out a term like that in the first place.
-
Jaguar-Wong-is-Dead — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 02:40 AM)
You keep on throwing around terms like 'intellectually hollow' while simultaneously dismissing something regarded as fact by anyone with common sense. It doesn't reflect well.
You can't be objective when assessing a piece of entertainment in any realistic or useful way.
I don't even know how we got into this, but I feel we wouldn't have done had the content of my OP been:
6.5/10 Would bang Harley Quinn -
Harry_Skywalker — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 06:12 PM)
Compared to the Great from marvel in it falls way, way short. But it's better than, say, Thor 2, about on a par with the first Captain America.
I really can't understand how you think you can be taken seriously with these abysmal hipster opinions.
Suicide Squad better than Thor 2 and on par with Captain America???????
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jaguar = Officially Insane
I always tell the truth, even when I lie. -
Yoss_and_the_Pilfered_Peaches — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 12:26 AM)
Didn't like it. Action scenes always felt flat. A lot of wasted characters, way too much focus on Will Smith and G.I. Boredom. Margot was good, even though her accent wobbled like crazy. Didn't even know she was Australian until I saw the film. It at least gave us the first good new Harley costume.
As long as the whole Superhero movie fad has been going, it's surprising how few good movies has come out of it. There's, like, one, and even that has plenty of issues.
I am on fire, but an extinguisher is not required -
Pambo_Calrissian — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 01:30 AM)
It is one of the few films I wish I could unsee. They wasted almost every character they used.
WB are making a real mess of things.99% Complete: [||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ]
-
saxondale7 — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 02:26 AM)
To be fair, I saw it with a pretty bad hangover, but I just remember thinking it was incoherent and obnoxious, and built upon sloppy performances, and a sloppier screenplay.
Then again, I've been surprised by the amount of real life people (ie not on the internet) who thought it was perfectly acceptable. Just as you have no idea what the hate and drama is about, I have no idea what people saw in the film to enjoy, but that's just how it falls.
Shut it, Love Actually! Do you want me to hole punch your face? -
ReapAndRepeat — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 08:28 AM)
Can't say I hated it. But I dunno, when it was over it just left an empty void. I couldn't really remember what it was about. For such a long introduction they sure had a problem with introducing an actual story, IMO. The early Enchantress was pretty cool though!
-