No thread about the audio leak yet? Okay, here's one:
-
NostradamACE — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 10:19 AM)
Yes, the real candidate who had to use her buddies at the DNC to cheat out the Jew Bernie Sanders because like back in her race against Obama, knew she could never win against a man who doesn't have to go on national TV and do the Whip and the Nae Nae to get the adoration of the public.
I second this notion of a do-over.
My Signature changes everyday! -
shroudoftheimmortal — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 10:32 AM)
I'm not arguing for the means by which she got her nomination, but for her capability to do the damn job. Are you arguing that she's incapable of performing the duties of president?
If we disqualified everyone who blurred the lines of ethics and legality, or even outright crossed them, of holding political office, how many people would be looking for new jobs tomorrow.
I would take this argument further, but I'll only be misinterpreted and ridiculed for itBut no one would raise a logical argument to the converse I love this board.
According to me, yes. I am the person it's usually according to when I'm talking. -
Harry_Skywalker — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 10:40 AM)
Are you arguing that she's incapable of performing the duties of president?
Hum yes. Benghazi. Emails scandal.
If we disqualified everyone who blurred the lines of ethics and legality, or even outright crossed them, of holding political office, how many people would be looking for new jobs tomorrow.
So we shouldn't disqualify Hillary Clinton for not being ethical and legal during her time in the office yet we should disqualify Donald Trump for some silly and stupid remarks regarding women in a private conversation and some possible tax immoral decisions yet still legal?
Leftists really love to claim they hold the higher ground yet everyone is basically the same.
I always tell the truth, even when I lie. -
shroudoftheimmortal — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 10:52 AM)
So we shouldn't disqualify Hillary Clinton for not being ethical and legal during her time in the office yet we should disqualify Donald Trump for some silly and stupid remarks regarding women in a private conversation and some possible tax immoral decisions yet still legal?
I mean if you want to boil my intentions down to their most basic possible meaning, the yeah, sure. Why not?
According to me, yes. I am the person it's usually according to when I'm talking.