Turns out after all he was on the island.
-
Chicxulub — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 12:47 AM)
It doesn't matter if he went there.
If you wanted Epstein's "services", you didn't have to go all the way his islands (he had 2).
He had countless girls in New York and other places.
And he and Trump were thick as thieves -
元才 — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 01:02 AM)
I think
everybody
in those elite circles of New York knew what was going on with Epstein.
Everyone
Trump knew, but did he partake?
We had Stormy Daniels a couple of years ago. You think that's the best they've got on him through Epstein's services? -
元才 — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 10:13 AM)
There's nothing linking Stormy and Epstein at the moment
But this is super pimp daddy Epstein and Mafia don Don we're talking about…apparently there's so much on these guys that it was an open secret everyone knew like Weinstein. There's pissing tapes and all sorts…or there isn't -
GuywhomadeMadosukocheeksclap — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 01:04 AM)
In 2006 , President Trump reported Both Epstein and Maxwell to the Fort Lauderdale Police department and asked them to look into what was going on.
It's a matter of public record and even the mainstream media was forced to admit this 3 weeks ago. So nothing you say has any truth in it. -
Chicxulub — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 01:24 AM)
Actually, it proves the opposite. Trump called the police chief in Palm Beach after the case became public. He said everyone knew about Epstein. It show he knew and didn't do anything about it, then attempted to disassociate himself.
-
WarrenPeace — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 01:58 AM)
Turd Lump said this?
Yeah, right.
Even if it was true it doesn't show or prove anything.
Why hang out with Epstien for all that time and why continue?
It doesn't take away that Turd Face went to his island.
So quit your reaching.
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
chumbawampa — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 02:35 PM)
Bill didn't squeal, maybe the leader of the Democratic party, and husband of Trump's rival for the position of POTUS, is telling the truth this time?
Bill Clinton telling the truth? Apparently you weren't there for the entire 90s? His credibility has been non existent since the Lewinsky scandal. Anything he says about Epstein should be taken for a grain of salt.
You think Bill Clinton's word is a defense for Trump? Are you joking??? It's BILL CLINTON. He LOST credibility a long, long time ago.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? -
元才 — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 02:41 PM)
But, he's married to Hillary and she's the second coming
It can't be both ways
Either Bill is top dawg and to be trusted or everything connected to him is a 'House of Cards'
There is but one rule: hunt or be hunted -
chumbawampa — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 03:12 PM)
Either Bill is top dawg and to be trusted or everything connected to him is a 'House of Cards
No. Everything doesn't have to be polar opposites.
In the real world, things can be 2 things at once. There's a lot of 'grey area'. Nothing is definite.
Bill has no credibility on Epstein, and Hillary Clinton does . They're 2 separate people. They aren't one homogenous person, melded together… just because they're married. A wife and husband = separate people. Why is that so hard for some of you to grasp? You want to tie everything they do together?
You want to talk about Hillary (who never met Jeffery Epstein) Yet you won't talk about how the CURRENT first lady Melania was FRIENDS with him?
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? -
元才 — 1 month ago(March 02, 2026 03:16 PM)
They're 2 separate people. They aren't one homogeneous person, melded together… separate people. Why is that so hard for some of you to grasp?
Did you just group a whole bunch of separate people together and treat them as one entity?
And yes, that's why -
chumbawampa — 1 month ago(March 03, 2026 12:33 AM)
Oh my god, I made an assumption and a generalization.
Are you going to be okay or do you need some therapy now ?
Also, not that it matters but I did NOT group a whole bunch of separate people together and treat them as one entity. I said "Why is that so hard for 'some of you' to grasp?" "Some of you" really isn't putting a whole bunch of people together.
Nice try though.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?