Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. 7.2 is way too low

7.2 is way too low

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
11 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — General Discussion


    agswain1987 — 15 years ago(March 23, 2011 11:46 PM)

    This is one of the best movies ever made in my opinion, I gave it a 10

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Zach126 — 15 years ago(March 24, 2011 11:43 PM)

        I agree. 7.2 is indeed way too low for this fine action thriller. It's one of Eastwood's very best films & probably the best film Wolfgang Peterson ever helmed. I would give it at least a 9 or 9.5 myself.
        "Flying thru hyperspace ain't like dusting crops boy!"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          coys77 — 14 years ago(April 29, 2011 04:35 PM)

          Yeah 7.2 is ridiculous. I gave it a 9..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            parker2010 — 14 years ago(May 22, 2011 03:39 PM)

            I too would give this one at least a 9I still pull this one out of my DVD collection every once in a whilegreat movie

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              JoeSchmoe007 — 10 years ago(November 15, 2015 06:31 PM)

              I agree that the movie is underrated but the best of Wolfgang Petersen's movies is easily Das Boot.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                vicky_lc2001 — 11 years ago(June 13, 2014 07:40 PM)

                I think 7.2 is too low as well, I have it an 8/10.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  frankzappayay — 11 years ago(September 30, 2014 12:46 AM)

                  It is a decent film but it has so many ridiculous moments, some really bad dialogue, and too much cheese.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    GreenGoblinsOckVenom86 — 11 years ago(November 04, 2014 02:56 PM)

                    I agree. I'd give it an 8 though. I'd like to buy it on bluray but haven't yet. I really can't say it's as good as Schindler's List which came out the same year.
                    When the Story Lady tells us about the naughty boy who blew up his goldfish.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      thomaswilliamboner — 11 years ago(January 08, 2015 06:51 PM)

                      Watching it now, it's been about 10 years. It is a really good movie, should be rated higher. It has also aged well, unlike a lot of movies from The 90's. Clint Eastwood is wonderful in it, so is John Malkovich.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Melton1 — 2 months ago(January 27, 2026 01:13 AM)

                        It’s a superb thriller that deserves at least an 8.5
                        Clint vs Malkovich is a dynamite pairing 💥

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups